People v. Wilson
| Decision Date | 05 July 2013 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Reginald WILSON, Also Known As Reginald M. Wilson, Defendant–Appellant. (Appeal No. 2.) |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from an amended sentence of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered June 22, 2010. The amended sentence directed defendant to pay restitution.
Bridget L. Field, Rochester, for Defendant–Appellant.
Reginald Wilson, Defendant–Appellant Pro Se.
Lawrence Friedman, District Attorney, Batavia (William G. Zickl of Counsel), for Respondent.
Same Memorandum as in People v. Wilson (Appeal No. 1) 108A.D.3d 1011, 968 N.Y.S.2d 300 (2013).
It is hereby ORDERED that the amended sentence so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
*860SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, and WHALEN, JJ., concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
-
Zetes v. Stephens
...108 A.D.3d 1014969 N.Y.S.2d 2982013 N.Y. Slip Op. 05102James P. ZETES, Plaintiff–Appellant–Respondent,v.Kelly A. STEPHENS and Lucas A. Stephens, Defendants,County of Niagara, James Voutour, in His Capacity as Niagara County Sheriff, and Guy Fratello, also known as G. Fratello, Individually ......
-
People v. Wilson
...a restitution hearing] regardless of its admissibility under the exclusionary rules of evidence ” (CPL 400.30[4] [emphasis added]; see [108 A.D.3d 1014]Tzitzikalakis, 8 N.Y.3d at 221, 832 N.Y.S.2d 120, 864 N.E.2d 44). It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously...
- Martinek v. State