People v. Wilson
Decision Date | 24 June 1968 |
Docket Number | No. 1,Docket No. 3687,1 |
Citation | 162 N.W.2d 161,11 Mich.App. 721 |
Parties | PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathaniel WILSON, Defendant-Appellant |
Court | Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US |
Edward P. Echlin, Detroit, for appellant.
Frank J. Kelley, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Derengoski, Sol. Gen., Lansing, William L. Cahalan, Pros. Atty., Samuel J. Torina, Chief Appellate Lawyer, Angelo A. Pentolino, Asst. Pros. Atty., Wayne County, Detroit, for appellee.
Before QUINN, P.J., and FITZGERALD and GILLIS, JJ.
By his plea of guilty of December 6, 1966, defendant was convicted of larceny from the person. C.L.1948, § 750.357 (Stat.Ann.1954 Rev. § 28.589). He was sentenced to prison and appeals. He contends the trial judge erred reversibly by failing to comply with C.L.1948, § 767.27 (Stat.Ann.1954 Rev. § 28.967). The record fails to disclose anything requiring a proceeding under the latter statute which requires a sanity hearing when applicable, nor does the record disclose any reason for defendant's attorney to have raised the issue of insanity.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Williams
...mere request for a competency hearing made by the defense attorney was insufficient to generate these proceedings, People v. Wilson, 11 Mich.App. 721, 162 N.W.2d 161 (1968), as the court was not obligated by statute to grant such a request. The trial judge's discretion however was not so br......
- Johnson v. Robinson
- Carney v. Gesmundo, Docket No. 4458