People v. Winkler

Citation161 A.D.2d 743,558 N.Y.S.2d 847
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Robert WINKLER, Appellant.
Decision Date21 May 1990
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

Jeff Bernstein (Howard M. Simms, Bayside, of counsel), for appellant. Carl A. Vergari, Dist. Atty. (Susan M. Cacace and Joseph M. Latino, White Plains, of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), rendered May 8, 1989, convicting him of sexual abuse in the first degree (twelve counts) and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the conviction of sexual abuse in the first degree under the eleventh and twelfth counts of the indictment, by vacating the sentence imposed thereon and dismissing those counts of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's pretrial motion to dismiss should have been granted with respect to the eleventh and twelfth counts of the indictment. Those two counts "span periods of time extending for 10 * * * months, [a] period * * * so excessive on [its] face that [it is] unreasonable" (People v. Keindl, 68 N.Y.2d 410, 419, 509 N.Y.S.2d 790, 502 N.E.2d 577; see also, People v. Beauchamp, 74 N.Y.2d 639, 541 N.Y.S.2d 977, 539 N.E.2d 1105; People v. Morris, 61 N.Y.2d 290, 473 N.Y.S.2d 769, 461 N.E.2d 1256). We have examined the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

THOMPSON, J.P., and BRACKEN, SULLIVAN and BALLETTA, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Watt
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 13 Enero 1992
    ...here, even considering the nature of the crime and the ages of the victims, is an excessive interval" (see also, People v. Winkler, 161 A.D.2d 743, 558 N.Y.S.2d 847; People v. Corrado, 161 A.D.2d 658, 556 N.Y.S.2d The time periods alleged at bar are 9 months, 13 months, and 12 months, respe......
  • People v. Watt
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 6 Julio 1993
    ...imprecise. Rather, these time allegations were entirely reasonable under the circumstances of this case (see, People v. Winkler, 161 A.D.2d 743, 558 N.Y.S.2d 847; People v. Benjamin R., 103 A.D.2d 663, 481 N.Y.S.2d The reasonableness of the five-month time allegations at bar is underscored ......
  • People v. Wright
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 21 Mayo 1990
  • People v. Winkler
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 19 Junio 1990

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT