People v. Woodard

Decision Date31 January 2020
Docket NumberKA 16–00185,1147
Citation119 N.Y.S.3d 334,179 A.D.3d 1504
Parties The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Justin WOODARD, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

179 A.D.3d 1504
119 N.Y.S.3d 334

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Justin WOODARD, Defendant–Appellant.

1147
KA 16–00185

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Entered: January 31, 2020


EDELSTEIN & GROSSMAN, NEW YORK CITY (JONATHAN I. EDELSTEIN OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT–APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, AND NEMOYER, JJ.

119 N.Y.S.3d 335

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

179 A.D.3d 1504

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals by permission of this Court from an order denying without a hearing his motion pursuant to CPL article 440 seeking to vacate on, inter alia, the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel the judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of murder in the second degree ( Penal Law § 125.25[3] ) and attempted robbery in the first degree (§§ 110.00, 160.15[2] ). We previously affirmed that judgment of conviction ( People v. Woodard , 96 A.D.3d 1619, 1619, 946 N.Y.S.2d 778 (4th Dept. 2012), lv denied 19 N.Y.3d 1030, 953 N.Y.S.2d 563, 978 N.E.2d 115 [2012] ).

Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because defense counsel failed to investigate the circumstances under which defendant provided a written statement to police. Preliminarily, we agree with defendant that his ineffective assistance of counsel claim is not procedurally barred by CPL 440.10(2)(c).

With respect to the merits, "[a] defendant's right to effective assistance of counsel includes defense counsel's reasonable investigation" ( People v. Rossborough , 122 A.D.3d 1244, 1245, 996 N.Y.S.2d 407 (4th Dept. 2014) ; see People v. Howard , 175 A.D.3d 1023, 1025, 107 N.Y.S.3d 583 (4th Dept. 2019) ; People v. Jenkins , 84 A.D.3d 1403, 1408, 923 N.Y.S.2d 706 (2d Dept. 2011), lv denied 19 N.Y.3d 1026, 953 N.Y.S.2d 560, 978 N.E.2d 112 [2012] ). Although "the failure to investigate may amount to ineffective assistance of counsel" ( Rossborough , 122 A.D.3d at 1245, 996 N.Y.S.2d 407 ; see People v. Kurkowski , 117 A.D.3d 1442, 1443, 984 N.Y.S.2d 761 (4th Dept. 2014) ), the governing standard is " ‘reasonable...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT