People v. Wynter
Decision Date | 05 February 2008 |
Docket Number | 2005-03513. |
Citation | 849 N.Y.S.2d 797,48 A.D.3d 492,2008 NY Slip Op 01186 |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DAVID WYNTER, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court properly denied those branches of the defendant's omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence obtained from his home and the lineup identification. "The credibility determinations of a hearing court are entitled to great deference on appeal, and will not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record" (People v Jenneman, 37 AD3d 736, 737 [2007]; see People v Cristobal, 136 AD2d 558 [1988]). The record supports the hearing court's determination to credit the testimony of the police witness, which established that the defendant's mother voluntarily consented to the search of the defendant's home that he shared with her (see People v Gonzalez, 39 NY2d 122 [1976]) and that the lineup identification procedure was not improperly conducted.
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Malaspina
...made by suppression court are entitled to great weight), People v. Bhattacharjee, 51 A.D.3d 684 [2d Dept 2008] (same), People v. Wynter, 48 A.D.3d 492 [2d Dept 2008] (same)]. The undisputed testimony is that P.O. Muscente has been involved in 50 to 60 DWI investigations in his career. Furth......
-
People v. Wynter
...N.E.2d 262 10 N.Y.3d 873 PEOPLE v. WYNTER. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. May 2, 2008. Appeal from 2d Dept.: 48 A.D.3d 492, 849 N.Y.S.2d 797 Application for leave to criminal appeal Denied. (Kaye, C.J.) ...
- People v. Zimmerman