Perez-Enriquez v. Gonzales, 03-70244.
| Decision Date | 30 January 2006 |
| Docket Number | No. 03-70244.,03-70244. |
| Parties | Jaime PEREZ-ENRIQUEZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Raul R. Labrador, Labrador Law Offices, Nampa, ID, Robert H. Gibbs, Esq., Gibbs Houston Pauw, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, MOH-District Counsel, Office of the Deputy Chief Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Helena, MT, Francis W. Fraser, Esq., Deborah N. Misir, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.
Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Perez-Enriquez v. Gonzales
...vacated the decision of the three-judge panel and taken the case en banc to consider Perez-Enriquez's petition anew. Perez-Enriquez v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir.2006). Because this was a streamlined decision, we review the IJ's decision as the final agency action. See Falcon Carriche......