Perez v. State, 82-2852
| Decision Date | 04 May 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-2852,82-2852 |
| Parties | Humberto PEREZ, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Jerry Hill, Public Defender, Bartow, and Deborah K. Brueckheimer, Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.
Humberto Perez, pro se.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Katherine V. Blanco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Defendant appeals judgments and sentences for trafficking, possession, and delivery of methaqualone, possession of phenobarbitol, and trafficking in cocaine, violations of sections 893.135 and 893.13, Florida Statutes (1981). Defendant filed a pro se brief after defense counsel filed an Anders brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). We agree with defendant's contentions that the trial court erred in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his nolo contendere plea.
At a combined change of plea and sentencing hearing, the court appointed an interpreter to assist in the proceeding because defendant was incapable of communicating in English. However, the trial court's inquiry of defendant to determine the voluntariness of defendant's plea pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c) began before the interpreter's participation in the proceeding had begun. In particular, the record reflects that the defendant was not advised, through the interpreter, on the possible minimum mandatory penalties which could be imposed. Such advice is necessary in order that a guilty or nolo contendere plea may be intelligently and voluntarily entered. See State v. Wilson, 395 So.2d 520 (Fla.1981); Thomas v. State, 386 So.2d 859 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.172(c)(i). Defendant adequately preserved this issue for appeal by moving to withdraw his plea. Robinson v. State, 373 So.2d 898 (Fla.1979); Counts v. State, 376 So.2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
The record also indicates that defendant lacked a full understanding of the court proceeding. For example, when asked if he understood that he was giving up certain rights by entering a plea, defendant responded:
THE INTERPRETER: The only people that he knows that would help him out are his parents and his wife but they weren't when, you know, they weren't with him when it happened and they don't speak English anyway.
Additionally, during the prosecutor's statement of the factual basis for the plea, defendant complained that he did not know what the prosecutor was talking about. Finally, after sentence was imposed, defendant questioned why he was sentenced to fifteen years (the minimum penalty for trafficking in methaqualone in the amounts charged).
Taken as a whole, the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Vittitoe v. State
...pleas made with ignorance of a minimum or mandatory minimum sentence are unenforceable. 1 Representative of these cases is Perez v. State, 449 So.2d 407 (Fla.App.1984), which In particular, the record reflects that the defendant was not advised ... on the possible minimum mandatory penaltie......
-
Clifford v. State
...plea, Clifford might be entitled to withdraw the plea. See, e.g., McLendon v. State, 502 So.2d 101 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Perez v. State, 449 So.2d 407 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Although a review of the plea colloquy might very well have resolved this motion, the circuit court did not attach to its ......
-
Coban v. State, 86-849
...must either strike that retention letting the original plea stand or let the defendant withdraw his guilty plea. In Perez v. State, 449 So.2d 407 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984), we said that in order for a guilty plea to be intelligently and voluntarily entered, the defendant must be advised of the min......
-
Harrison v. State, 90-01135
...penalties involved in the offense(s) to which he is pleading, and a failure to do so may render the plea involuntary. Perez v. State, 449 So.2d 407 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). The court is also obliged to honor plea bargains calling for a specific sentence arrangement, or, if it cannot, to afford t......