Perry v. Gibson

Decision Date20 November 1957
Docket NumberNo. 386,386
Citation247 N.C. 212,100 S.E.2d 341
PartiesSherwood PERRY, Administrator of the Estate of James Perry, Deceased, v. C. P. GIBSON.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Taylor & Mitchell, Raleigh, for plaintiff appellant.

Arendell & Green, Alton T. Cummings, Raleigh, for defendant appellee.

DENNY, Justice.

The plaintiff assigns as error the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury 'that the jury and not the defendant is the judge of whether or not the defendant had reasonable grounds to believe that a misdemeanor had been committed in the presence of the defendant.'

The court read G.S. § 15-41, as amended by Chapter 58 of the Session Laws of 1955, to the jury, and instructed the jury 'that while it is not necessary that a crime, a misdemeanor, or a felony actually has been committed in the officer's presence, in order to justify the officer's making an arrest, it is necessary that the officer have reasonable grounds to believe that an offense has been committed in his presence, in order for him to make a lawful arrest.'

The trial judge likewise instructed the jury 'that under the laws of this State, a peace officer, that is a police officer, has a right to make an arrest without a warrant if there is a breach of the peace or a threatened breach of the peace in the presence of the officer * * * To have a breach of the peace there must be a disturbance of public order and tranquility by act or conduct not merely amounting to unlawfulness but tending also to create public tumult and incite others to break the peace. To justify an arrest on ground of necessity to suppress a breach of the peace the conduct of the person arrested must amount to an act or breach of the peace in the presence of the person making the arrest. To justify an arrest in order to prevent a breach of the peace ordinarily there must be at least a threat of a breach of the peace, together with some overt act in attempted execution of the threat.'

The court further instructed the jury 'that where an officer has the right to make an arrest, that is where there is a breach of the peace in his presence or a threatened breach of the peace in his presence, or if he has reasonable grounds to believe that a misdemeanor has been committed in his presence, where one has in fact been committed or not, if he has reasonable grounds to so believe, then I instruct you that officer making an arrest may meet force with force sufficient to overcome any force offered by the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Irick
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • January 31, 1977
    ...situations in which a police officer may use deadly force without fear of incurring criminal or civil liability. See Perry v. Gibson, 247 N.C. 212, 100 S.E.2d 341 (1957); Sossamon v. Cruse, 133 N.C. 470, 45 S.E. 757 (1903); G.S. 15A--401(d)(2). See also Corbett, Criminal Process and Arrest ......
  • Giles v. FIRST VIRGINIA CREDIT SERVICES
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • March 5, 2002
    ...tumult and incite others to break the peace." State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 482, 83 S.E.2d 100, 104 (1954). See also Perry v. Gibson, 247 N.C. 212, 100 S.E.2d 341 (1957) (wrongful death case stating the same definition for breach of the peace). Such "`[a] breach of the peace may be occasio......
  • Jenkins v. Averett
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • April 20, 1970
    ...— strong evidence" of abuse, to be weighed by the finder of fact. State v. Pugh 101 N.C. at 738, 7 S.E. at 758; Perry v. Gibson, 247 N.C. 212, 100 S.E.2d 341 (1957). In the present case no force was needed to restrain Jenkins. Since use of the unnecessary force was correctly found by the co......
  • Jenkins v. Starkey, Docket No. 78-3852
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Michigan — District of US
    • March 4, 1980
    ...v. Barfield, 334 F.Supp. 475 (W.D.Mo.1971), and state, Skinner v. Brooks, 74 Ohio App. 288, 58 N.E.2d 697 (1944), Perry v. Gibson, 247 N.C. 212, 100 S.E.2d 341 (1957), In re Removal of Pickering, 25 Ohio App.2d 58, 266 N.E.2d 248 (1970), Manson v. Wabash R. Co., 338 S.W.2d 54 (Mo., 1960), a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT