Perry v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc.
Decision Date | 31 August 2004 |
Docket Number | No. 49A02-0403-CV-225.,49A02-0403-CV-225. |
Citation | 814 N.E.2d 634 |
Parties | James L. PERRY and Carolyn S. Perry, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. GULF STREAM COACH, INC. and Mark's RV Sales, Inc., Appellees-Defendants. |
Court | Indiana Appellate Court |
Robert S. Rifkin, Clinton E. Blanck, Maurer Rifkin & Hill, P.C., Carmel, IN, Attorneys for Appellants.
Brian L. Hoffer, Randy J. Spitaels, Kindig & Sloat, PC, Nappanee, IN, Attorneys for Appellee Gulf Stream Coach, Inc.
Christopher R. Whitten, Craig J. Helmreich, Scopelitis Garvin Light & Hanson, Indianapolis, IN, Attorneys for Appellee Mark's RV Sales, Inc.
Appellants-Plaintiffs James L. Perry and Carolyn S. Perry (the "Perrys") appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Appellees-Defendants Gulf Stream Coach, Incorporated ("Gulf Stream") and Mark's RV Sales, Incorporated ("Mark's RV"). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The Perrys raise one issue, which we expand and restate as:
The relevant designated facts are undisputed. In 1999, the Perrys decided to purchase "a Class A motor home with a length of 25 or 26 feet." Appellants' App. at 27, ¶ 13. Because Gulf Stream is in the business of manufacturing and selling motor homes, the Perrys contacted Gulf Stream and inquired into purchasing a Class A motor home. Gulf Stream gave the Perrys the contact information for Mark's RV, an authorized dealer for Gulf Stream. On December 8, 1999, the Perrys arrived at Mark's RV and read a brochure ("Brochure") regarding the "Conquest 2000 by Gulf Stream." The Brochure indicated that the Conquest 2000 had power steering and brakes and a Front Gross Axle Weight Rating ("Front GAWR") of 4,800 pounds.1 In addition, the Brochure highlighted numerous features of the Conquest 2000, including "Generous Overhead Storage," "Large Under Bed Storage," and "Steel-Formed Exterior Storage." Gulf Stream's App. at 230. The Brochure directed those who wish to purchase the Conquest 2000 to "v MARK'S [RV] BEFORE YOU BUY." Id. (emphasis in original). The Brochure also provided potential customers with Mark's RV's business address, phone number, and Internet address.
At Mark's RV, the Perrys walked through the Conquest 2000 ("Motor Home") for five to ten minutes "to see if it matched the [B]rochure." Appellants' App. at 27, ¶ 18. The Perrys did not test drive the Motor Home. That same day, the Perrys agreed to purchase the Motor Home for a price of $54,521.50. The Purchase Agreement between Mark's RV and the Perrys provides, in part, that:
Purchasers certify that the matter printed on the back hereof has been read and agreed to as a part of this agreement the same as though it were printed above the signatures....
Mark's RV App. at 162. On the back of the Purchase Agreement, the following clause appears:
Id. at 163 (emphasis in original). On the bottom of the back page, the following integration clause appears:
Along with the Purchase Agreement, Mr. Perry also signed the "Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. Limited Warranty" ("Limited Warranty"), which provides, in relevant part, that:
Id. at 166 (emphasis in original).
The Motor Home has the following manufacturer's rated capacities: (1) a fifty gallon fresh water tank at 8.328 pounds per gallon for a total weight of 416.4 pounds; (2) a fifty gallon water gray holding tank for a total weight of 416.4 pounds; (2) a fifty gallon water black holding tank for a total weight of 416.4 pounds; (3) an LP gas tank with a capacity of sixty-five pounds; (4) a forty gallon fuel tank at six pounds per gallon for a total weight of 240 pounds; (5) four passengers at one hundred and fifty pounds per person when the passengers are seated, belted, and traveling for a total weight of 600 pounds.
Despite these weighted capacities, the Certificate of Origin of the chassis of the Motor Home, which was built by Workhorse Custom Chassis, LLC, ("Workhorse") demonstrates that the shipping weight of the chassis was 4,221 pounds and that the Gross Vehicle Weight Rating ("GVWR") is 12,300 pounds. The Certificate of Origin of the Motor Home, i.e., chassis and motor home body, indicates that the shipping weight of the vehicle was 11,073 pounds and that the GVWR is 12,300 pounds. The latter shipping weight, however, did not include the weight of any fluids. The difference between the GVWR — i.e., the maximum weight capacity of the Motor Home — and the shipping weight of the Motor Home after it was fully assembled by Gulf Stream is 1,227 pounds.
The owner's manual to the Motor Home provides, in relevant part, as follows:
After purchasing the Motor Home and driving it for approximately 2,000 miles, Mr. Perry noticed problems with steering. In January of 2000, the Perrys took their first trip in the Motor Home and experienced "problems with stopping, braking and handling the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Reger v. Ariz. RV Ctrs., LLC
...24-5-0.5-1(b). Under the Act, a consumer is authorized to sue a supplier that engages in "deceptive acts." Perry v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., 814 N.E.2d 634, 646 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). The Act expressly prohibits suppliers from "commit[ting] an unfair, abusive, or deceptive act, omission, or ......
-
Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp.
...or mislead, whereas an “uncured” deceptive act is one the supplier failed to “cure” after receiving notice. Perry v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., 814 N.E.2d 634, 647 (Ind.Ct.App.2004). There is no catchall fraud category under the IDSCA; a plaintiffs allegations must fit into one of the enumera......
-
Chaurasia v. General Motors Corp.
...Liability to Repair or Replacement of Defective Parts, 2 A.L.R.4th 576, § 5(b) (1980 and 2004 Supp.); Perry v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., 814 N.E.2d 634, 644 (Ind.App.Ct.2004), rehearing denied (Oct. 26, 2004); Razor, 286 Ill.Dec. 190, 813 N.E.2d at 258-59; Lara, 264 Ill.Dec. 416, 770 N.E.2d ......
-
Dzielak v. Whirlpool Corp.
...or mislead, whereas an "uncured" deceptive act is one the supplier failed to "cure" after receiving notice. Perry v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., 814 N.E.2d 634, 647 (Ind. Ct. App. 2004). There is no catchall fraud category under the IDSCA; a plaintiff's allegations must fit into one of the enu......