Perry v. Ridgecrest Intern., 88-2989
| Decision Date | 08 September 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 88-2989,88-2989 |
| Citation | 548 So.2d 826,14 Fla. L. Weekly 2113 |
| Parties | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2113 Kenneth PERRY, Appellant, v. RIDGECREST INTERNATIONAL and CNA Insurance, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Arthur P. Pumpian of Law Offices of David A. Danielson, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Kevin M. Fitzmaurice of Adams, Kelley, Kronenberg & Kelly, Miami, for appellees.
The claimant in this workers' compensation proceeding appeals the deputy's denial of payment of past medical bills. We reverse in part and affirm in part.
Appellant suffered damage to his brain and central nervous system from exposure to pesticides in the course of his employment. He also suffers from cardiovascular problems, but the medical evidence was insufficient to establish a causal link between the cardiovascular problems and the pesticide exposure.
Much of the medical attention received by appellant occurred outside of the State of Florida. The deputy found that, with the exception of treatment by Dr. Gard, a California specialist, the employer/carrier is not obligated to pay for treatment provided by the out-of-state physicians. This denial of payment was based upon the principle that a claimant who seeks payment for out-of-state treatment or evaluation must demonstrate that equally beneficial treatment was not available in Florida. See Layne-Western Company v. Cox, 497 So.2d 955 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). The deputy found that appellant made such a showing only as to Dr. Gard. Appellant appeals the denial of payment for out-of-state evaluation and treatment, and the E/C cross-appeals the deputy's ruling that it is obligated to pay for Dr. Gard's treatment.
We need not reach the merits on the question of whether the above referred principle is supported by the evidence in this case because we agree with appellant's contention that this defense to payment of the medical expenses was not properly noticed and therefore should not have been considered by the deputy. Scott v. Amick Corporation, 529 So.2d 816 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Accordingly, the award of payment for Dr. Gard's treatment is affirmed and the denial of payment for other out-of-state treatment and evaluation is reversed.
We also reverse the denial of appellant's claim for payment of medical expenses incurred in the diagnosis of the noncompensable cardiovascular condition. The diagnostic procedures were performed after the occurrence of the exposure to the pesticide, and the efforts to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Prince v. Prince Ins. Services
...noncompensable conditions. Nealy v. City of West Palm Beach, 491 So.2d 585, 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). See also Perry v. Ridgecrest International, 548 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Green Chromalloy-Turbocumbustor, 540 So.2d 874, 876 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Sumner v. Gardinier, Inc., 526 So.2d 1......
-
Scott v. Bisanti Services, Inc.
...if it should later be determined that the claimant suffered from both compensable and noncompensable conditions. Perry v. Ridgecrest Int'l, 548 So.2d 826 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Green v. Chromalloy-Turbocumbustor, 540 So.2d 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Hamilton v. Early Bird Stud Farms, 540 So.2d ......
-
Arnau v. Stores
...586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); see also Superior Concrete Constr. v. Olsen, 616 So.2d 183, 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Perry v. RidgecrestInt'l, 548 So.2d 826, 827–28 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Here, the record does not support the JCC's finding that clear and convincing evidence existed sufficient to rej......
-
Mettler v. Sibco, Inc.
...it should later be determined that the claimant suffered from both compensable and noncompensable conditions. Perry v. Ridgecrest Intern., 548 So.2d 826, 827-28 (Fla.App.1989) (citations omitted). Furthermore, we have previously acknowledged that there may be instances where nonwork related......