Perry v. State, CR73--56

Decision Date16 July 1973
Docket NumberNo. CR73--56,CR73--56
Citation254 Ark. 939,497 S.W.2d 10
CourtArkansas Supreme Court
PartiesWillie Lee PERRY, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.

Sam L. Anderson, Hot Springs, for appellant.

Jim Guy Tucker, Atty. Gen. by Charles A. Banks, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.

GEORGE ROSE SMITH, Justice.

Willie Lee Perry was charged with murder in the second degree, was found guilty of that offense, and was sentenced to ten years imprisonment. We find no merit in his two points for reversal.

First, Perry's counsel, in seeking to prove self-defense by showing that the decedent was the aggressor, attempted to cross-examine police officers about the decedent's police record. That evidence was properly excluded, because it would at best have shown specific acts rather than general reputation. Sanders v. State, 245 Ark. 321, 432 S.W.2d 467 (1968). Moreover, there was no proffer of proof, even though one of the officers had the record with him; so we have no way of knowing whether the record contained relevant information helpful to the accused. Consequently, if the record should prove to be inadmissible, as apparently it was, a retrial would be found to have been wholly unnecessary.

Secondly, it is contended that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury with respect to the lesser included offense of manslaughter. The burden was upon counsel to request such an instruction. Johnson v. State, 214 Ark. 902, 218 S.W.2d 687 (1949). No such request was made, doubtless for the reason that the defense, as a matter of strategy, elected to confine the jury to the choice between a finding of second degree murder and an acquittal. That gamble having failed, the defendant is not entitled to an opportunity to change his tactics at a second trial.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Hoover v. State, CR-77-187
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • 27 Febrero 1978
    ...... Perry v. State, 254 Ark. 939, 497 S.W.2d 10; Stevens v. State, 231 Ark. 734, 332 S.W.2d 482.         Appellant's argument that the evidence was ......
  • State v. Padgett
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of South Dakota
    • 30 Abril 1980
    ...of a victim are not admissible on the issue of self-defense. See, e. g., State v. Jacoby, 260 N.W.2d 828 (Iowa 1977); Perry v. State, 254 Ark. 939, 497 S.W.2d 10 (1973); People v. Adams, 71 Ill.App.3d 70, 27 Ill.Dec. 277, 388 N.E.2d 1326 (1979); State v. Maggitt, 517 S.W.2d 105 (Mo.1974); S......
  • State v. Infantolino
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Rhode Island
    • 23 Abril 1976
    ...a general rule proof of bad character may be shown only by general reputation and not by specific acts of misconduct. Perry v. State, 254 Ark. 939, 497 S.W.2d 10 (1973); State v. Padula, 106 Conn. 454, 138 A. 456 (1927); State v. Keaton, 258 Minn. 359, 104 N.W.2d 650 (1960); Commonwealth v.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT