Peskin v. Port of New York Authority

Decision Date23 November 1959
Citation9 A.D.2d 787,193 N.Y.S.2d 1021
PartiesWilliam PESKIN, Plaintiff, v. PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY, Cauldwell-Wingate Co., Inc., Appellants, Ment Bros. Iron Works Co., Inc., Respondent, and Eastern Airlines, Inc., Defendant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Rudser & Fitzmaurice, New York City, for appellants.

Wm. F. McNulty, New York City, of counsel.

William Kenney, New York City, for respondent Francis X. McHugh, New York City, of counsel.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the appeal is from so much of a judgment as dismissed appellants' cross complaint against respondent. Judgment, 16 Misc.2d 195, 183 N.Y.S.2d 665, insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Palanker v. Edwards Properties, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 21 Noviembre 1961
    ...Construction Corp., 290 N.Y. 145, 48 N.E.2d 299; Peskin v. Port of New York Authority, 16 Misc.2d 195, 183 N.Y.S.2d 665, aff'd 9 A.D.2d 787, 193 N.Y.S.2d 1021). In the case before us, the burden of proof is upon Edwards Properties, Inc. to establish by a fair preponderance of the evidence t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT