Peters v. Schillig-Scott Lumber Co.
Decision Date | 03 March 1941 |
Docket Number | 14612. |
Citation | 107 Colo. 310,111 P.2d 898 |
Parties | PETERS v. SCHILLIG-SCOTT LUMBER CO. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied March 31, 1941.
In Department.
Error to District Court, Logan County; H. E. Munson, Judge.
Action by Emily Louise Peters against the Schillig-Scott Lumber Company, to recover damages for negligence in constructing and maintaining a defective and dangerous means of entrance to defendant's business premises. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff appeals.
Reversed and case remanded with directions.
Pershing Nye, Bosworth & Dick and Samuel S. Sherman, Jr., all of Denver, and Marcus C. Leh, of Sterling, for plaintiff in error.
Sauter & Sandhouse, of Sterling, for defendant in error.
This is an action for damages based upon the alleged negligence of defendant in error in constructing and maintaining a defective and dangerous means of entrance to and exit from its business premises. The parties to the action are here in the same relative capacity as they appeared in the court below, and for convenience reference will hereinafter be made to them as plaintiff and defendant. Defendant filed a general demurrer to the complaint, which was sustained. Plaintiff elected to stand upon her complaint, which election was followed in due course by a dismissal, and entry of judgment in favor of defendant.
The record discloses that the sole question Before us for determination is the adequacy of averment of facts in the complaint, as to the negligence of defendant, to state a cause of action. In considering a general demurrer on this ground, it is the settled rule that all well-pleaded facts must be accepted as true.
The pertinent portions of the allegations of the complaint herein are as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cogswell v. C. C. Anderson Stores Co, 7383
... ... Ry ... Co., 49 Wash. 626, 96 P. 150, 18 L.R.A.,N.S., 209; ... Puget Sound Lumber Co. v. Mechanics' & Traders' ... Ins. Co., 168 Wash. 46, 10 P.2d 568; Leek v. Northern ... Pac ... Tyler v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 181 Wash. 125, 41 P.2d ... 1093; Peters v. Schillig-Scott Lbr. Co., 107 Colo ... 310, 111 P.2d 898; Restatement of the Law-Torts and ... ...
-
Milby v. Pace Pontiac, Inc., 4951
...Co., 4 Cir.1962, 303 F.2d 61; Wood v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 1942, 212 Minn. 551, 4 N.W.2d 617; Peters v. Schillig-Scott Lumber Co., 1941, 107 Colo. 310, 111 P.2d 898; Hixenbaugh v. J. G. McCrory Co., 1941, 145 Pa.Super, 586, 20 A.2d 910, 21 A.2d 242, dissenting opinion; Hanse......
-
Blackburn v. Tombling, 20725
...due care leaving the hotel could fail to observe the difference between the hotel and street levels. See Peters v. Schillig-Scott Lumber Co., 107 Colo. 310, 111 P.2d 898. In the first trial, in addition to the above, there was introduced into evidence the opinion of an architect that the st......
-
King Soopers, Inc. v. Mitchell
...care to discover perils. John Thompson Grocery Co. v. Phillips, 22 Colo.App. 428, 125 [140 Colo. 125] P. 563; Peters v. Schillig-Scott Lumber Co., 107 Colo. 310, 111 P.2d 898; Rudolph v. Elder, 105 Colo. 105, 95 P.2d 827; Scott v. Greeley Joslin Store Co., 125 Colo. 367, 243 P.2d 394. This ......