Petition of Brown, 89-1396
| Decision Date | 07 March 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 89-1396,89-1396 |
| Citation | 551 N.E.2d 954,49 Ohio St.3d 222 |
| Parties | In re Petition of BROWN for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Edward C. Brown, pro se.
Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., Atty. Gen. and Alexander G. Thomas, Columbus, for appellee.
We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Petitioner has no cause of action either by writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum or writ of habeas corpus ad subjiciendum. The former issues to bring a prisoner before a court to prosecute in a jurisdiction other than where he is imprisoned and has no application in this case. The latter issues to inquire into illegal restraint of liberty. Neither will issue simply to grant a new first appeal as of right.
This does not leave a person claiming denial of effective assistance of appellate counsel without an adequate remedy. The claim is based on constitutional guarantees. Therefore, it may be appealed as of right to this court under Section 2(B)(2)(a)(iii) of Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, to be dealt with as prescribed in Section 3(B), Rule II of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio. We deem this an adequate remedy at law, which precludes issuance of the writ of habeas corpus. In re Hunt (1976), 46 Ohio St.2d 378, 75 O.O.2d 450, 348 N.E.2d 727.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lopez v. Wilson
...See Manning, 912 F.2d at 882 (citing Manning v. Alexander, 50 Ohio St.3d 127, 553 N.E.2d 264 (Ohio1990); In re: Petition of Brown, 49 Ohio St.3d 222, 551 N.E.2d 954 (1990)). Furthermore, Murnahan emphatically holds that any such attack cannot be considered part of an Ohio post-conviction If......
-
Lopez v. Wilson
...See Manning, 912 F.2d at 882 (citing Manning v. Alexander, 50 Ohio St.3d 127, 553 N.E.2d 264 (Ohio 1990); In re: Petition of Brown, 49 Ohio St.3d 222, 551 N.E.2d 954 (1990)). Furthermore, Murnahan emphatically holds that any such attack cannot be considered part of an Ohio post-conviction I......
-
State v. David Lee Kenney
... ... Evitts v ... Lucy (1985), 469 U.S. 387, 396; In re Petition of ... Brown (1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 222, 223. The failure to ... provide effective ... ...
-
State v. Dewaine Poindexter
...State v. Broom (1988), 40 Ohio St. 3d 277, 533 N.E.2d 682. We hold, however, that the procedure mentioned above and outlined in In re Petition of Brown, supra, does include a R.C. 2953.21 postconviction petition, contrary to the holding of the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in......