Petrillo v. Connecticut Co.
| Decision Date | 15 December 1917 |
| Citation | Petrillo v. Connecticut Co., 92 Conn. 235, 102 A. 607 (Conn. 1917) |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | PETRILLO. v. CONNECTICUT CO. |
Appeal from Common Pleas Court, New Haven County; Earnest C. Simpson, Judge.
Action by John Petrillo against the Connecticut Company to recover damages for injuries to plaintiff's automobile through a collision with defendant's trolley car, alleged to have been caused by negligence of the defendant's motorman. From refusal to set aside judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals. No error.
Joseph Koletsky, of New Haven, for appellant.
Seth W. Baldwin, of New Haven, for appellee.
Upon the evidence presented by the plaintiff, assumed to be true, it would have been impossible for a trier reasonably to find that he was free from contributory negligence. There was no substantial evidence to that effect worthy of being weighed and considered by the jury. On the contrary, the evidence unmistakably shows that the plaintiff's negligence was a proximate cause of the head-on collision between his car and the defendant's, in that he failed to discover, as in the exercise of ordinary prudence he should have done, the presence of the defendant's trolley car approaching him from the front when it was some distance away and...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Correnti v. Catino
...160 A. 892 115 Conn. 213 CORRENTI v. CATINO. Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut.June 21, 1932 ... Appeal ... from Superior Court, Fairfield County; Arthur F. Ells, Judge ... Action ... by Frank Correnti ... afford a reasonable basis for finding each and all of these ... elements to have existed, the doctrine may not be applied, ... Petrillo v. Connecticut Co., 92 Conn. 235, 236, 102 ... A. 607; Curtis v. Bristol & Plainville Electric Co., ... 102 Conn. 238, 128 A. 517; Oddwyez v ... ...
-
DePaola v. Seamour
...a reasonable basis for finding each and all of these elements to have existed the doctrine may not be applied. Petrillo v. Connecticut Co., 92 Conn. 235, 236, 102 A. 607; Curtis v. Bristol & Plainville Electric Co., 102 Conn. 238, 128 A. 517; Oddwycz v. Connecticut Co., 108 Conn. 71, 142 A.......
-
Richard v. New York, N.H. & H. R. Co.
... ... 451 104 Conn. 229 RICHARD v. NEW YORK, N.H. & H. R. CO. WHITAKER ET AL. v. NEW YORK, N.H. & H. R. CO. Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut.February 23, 1926 ... Appeal ... from Superior Court, Hartford County; Allyn L. Brown, Judge ... Actions ... by John G ... Levinson, 111 ... A. 794, 95 Conn. 466, 468; Hygienic Ice Co. v ... Connecticut Co., 96 A. 152, 90 Conn. 21, 23; ... Petrillo v. Connecticut Co., 102 A. 607, 92 Conn ... 235, 236; Nehring v. Connecticut Co., 84 A. 301, ... 524, 86 Conn. 109, 120, 45 L.R.A. (N. S.) 896, ... ...
-
Ireland v. Connecticut Co.
... ... contributory negligence was within the province of the jury ... Livingston v. Chambers, 191 Iowa, 966, 183 N.W. 429; ... Speakes Lime & Cement Co. v. Duluth Street Ry. Co., ... 172 Wis. 475, 179 N.W. 596. The case is very different from ... Petrillo v. Connecticut Co., 92 Conn. 235, 102 A ... 607, relied upon by the defendant company. There it was said ... that the evidence unmistakably showed the plaintiff guilty of ... contributory negligence " in that he failed to discover, ... as in the exercise of ordinary prudence he should have ... ...