Petty v. State
Decision Date | 03 June 1893 |
Citation | 22 S.W. 654,58 Ark. 1 |
Parties | PETTY v. STATE |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from White Circuit Court, GRANT GREEN, JR., Judge.
Judgment affirmed.
The appellant pro se.
The word store has a well defined and understood signification which is broader than the word shop. The words are not synonymous. See 45 Ark. 348; 25 Am. Rep. 646; 19 N.H. 135; 29 Ala. 651; 2 Am. Cr. Rep. 470; 3 Cr. Law. Mag. 640. The legislature never made it a crime to keep open a shop, unless it was in fact a store.
James P. Clarke, Attorney General, for appellee.
In common parlance "shop" and "store" mean about the same thing. See Webster, Int. Dic.; Anderson, Law Dic.; 14 Gray, 378; 15 id. 199; Browne, Jud. Int. Words. Our statute requires that words shall be taken in their common acceptation. 56 Ark. 386.
At the January term, 1893, the appellant, N. B. Petty, was indicted by the grand jury of White county, charged with the crime of Sabbath breaking by keeping open a store on the 12th day of June, 1892, in said county, and upon trial was found guilty and appealed to this court.
The evidence of the only witness shows that the appellant, in the year 1892, was engaged in selling meats and also vegetables in their season; that he occupied a latticed building which had doors and locks thereon; that witness was in the employ of appellant; that he helped appellant sell meats and vegetables for about three months in the summer of the year 1892; and that the shop was open every Sunday during that time. The place is designated by witness as a butcher shop.
It is contended by counsel for appellant that the keeping open this shop does not come within the inhibition of the statute (sec. 1887 Mansfield's Digest, as amended by the act of the General Assembly, March 2, 1885), which is as follows: "Every person who shall, on Sunday, keep open any store or retail any goods, wares and merchandise, or keep open any dram shop or grocery, or who shall keep the doors of the same so as to afford ingress or egress, or retail or sell any spirits or wine, shall, on conviction thereof, be fined in any sum not less than twenty-five dollars, nor more than one hundred dollars."
Webster's International Dictionary gives the following definitions to "shop" and "store:" Anderson's Dictionary of Law gives the following definition of shop: Rapalje & Lawrence's Law Dictionary defines store as synonymous with shop. These definitions are supported by the Supreme Court of Massachusetts in the cases...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Road Improvement District No. 6 v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad Company
...275 F. 600. The Legislature cannot, by the enactment of a retrospective statute, exercise a power in its nature clearly judicial. 58 Ark. 1; 257 547. OPINION SMITH, J. The appellant road improvement district was organized in 1917 under what is known as the Alexander road law. (Acts 1915, p.......
-
McKeown v. State
... ... Ark. 754, 286 S.W. 877, 47 A. L. R. 1104. Upon undisputed ... proof that the defendant had sold gasoline on Sunday, in ... violation of a city ordinance patterned from the state law, ... the court directed a verdict of guilty. On appeal the ... judgment was affirmed. The opinion cites Petty v ... State, 58 Ark. 1, 22 S.W. 654, and Goff v ... State, 20 Ark. 289 ... Trial ... courts are empowered to direct verdicts of guilty in ... misdemeanor cases where the punishment is by fine only if the ... facts are undisputed, and where from all the evidence the ... ...
-
McKeown v. State
...patterned from the state law, the court directed a verdict of guilty. On appeal the judgment was affirmed. The opinion cites Petty v. State, 58 Ark. 1, 22 S.W. 654, and State v. Goff, 20 Ark. 289, Trial courts are empowered to direct verdicts of guilty in misdemeanor cases where the punishm......
-
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hearn
...to work on Sunday against his will. Art. 2, § 24, Constitution, 1874; Kirby's Dig., § 2030; 20 Ark. 289-291; 85 Ark. 134-136; 56 Ark. 124; 58 Ark. 1; 18 Md. 341-357. Ordinary risks of delay from accidents to the line are assumed by the sender and addressee. Fed. Cas. No. 4004. 3. The messag......