PHB, Inc. v. Goldsmith, B--5952

Decision Date30 June 1976
Docket NumberNo. B--5952,B--5952
PartiesPHB, INC., Petitioner, v. Mrs. W. T. GOLDSMITH, Respondent.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Werner & Rusk, John C. Werner, Houston, for petitioner.

Meyer Jacobson, Houston, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

PHB, Inc. brought a bill of review to set aside a prior judgment in which Mrs. W. T. Goldsmith had been awarded title and possession to certain real estate. Mrs. Goldsmith filed a motion for summary judgment which the trial court granted. The Court of Civil Appeals affirmed. 534 S.W.2d 196.

The trial court's order of dismissal, dated April 26, 1974, and discussed by the Court of Civil Appeals at 534 S.W.2d 197, did not refer to or mention Mrs. Goldsmith's counterclaim. Under such circumstances, there is no presumption that the order of dismissal disposed of the issues in the counterclaim. North East Independent School District v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893 (Tex.1966); Davis v. McCray Refrigerator Sales Corp., 136 Tex. 296, 150 S.W.2d 377 (1941). It follows that the April 26, 1974 order was interlocutory, rather than final, in nature. The trial court thereby retained jurisdiction of the counterclaim until final judgment was entered on October 18, 1974. The writ of error is refused, no reversible error. Tex.R.Civ.P. 483.

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Gilchrist v. Bandera Elec. Co-op., Inc.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • March 20, 1996
    ...v. Hansen, 679 S.W.2d 480, 481 (Tex.1984); Chessher, 658 S.W.2d at 564; Clear Creek Basin Auth., 589 S.W.2d at 678; PHB, Inc. v. Goldsmith, 539 S.W.2d 60 (Tex.1976); However, the judgment granted by the trial court purports to dispose of all parties and issues, which invokes the jurisdictio......
  • Macarangal v. Andrews
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • July 21, 1992
    ...that the dismissal order also disposed of issues in an independent cross-action or counterclaim. Id. at 897; see also PHB, Inc. v. Goldsmith, 539 S.W.2d 60 (Tex.1976). In this case, National Union asserted its subrogation claim by a plea in intervention. The caption of the December 31, 1991......
  • Williams v. National Mortg. Co., 05-94-00685-CV
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • June 12, 1995
    ... ... See Bellair, Inc. v. Aviall of Tex., Inc., 819 S.W.2d 895, 899 (Tex.App.--Dallas 1991, writ ... Hepburn, 89 Tex. 622, 625, 35 S.W. 1056, 1057 (1896); PHB, Inc. v. Goldsmith, 534 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Tex.Civ.App.--Houston [14th ... ...
  • Phillips v. Montoya
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Civil Appeals
    • October 27, 2017
    ...judgments. Teer v. Duddlesten, 664 S.W.2d 702, 704 (Tex. 1984) ; Baker v. Hansen, 679 S.W.2d 480, 481 (Tex. 1984) ; PHB, Inc. v. Goldsmith, 539 S.W.2d 60 (Tex. 1976) ; Dickerson v. Mack Financial Corporation, 452 S.W.2d 552, 554–55 (Tex. Civ. App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1969, writ ref'd n.r.e.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT