Phelps Dodge Corporation v. ford, 5103
Decision Date | 07 March 1949 |
Docket Number | 5103 |
Parties | PHELPS DODGE CORPORATION v. FORD et al |
Court | Arizona Supreme Court |
Appeal from Award of Industrial Commission.
Proceeding under the Occupational Disease Disability Law, by Thomas Ford, claimant, opposed by the Phelps Dodge Corporation employer. To review an award of the Industrial Commission in favor of the claimant, the employer brings certiorari.
Reversed.
Evans Hull, Kitchel & Jenckes and Denison Kitchel, all of Phoenix for petitioner.
H. S. McCluskey, of Phoenix (Robert E. Yount, of Phoenix, of counsel), for respondents.
Respondent Thomas Ford filed claim on November 18, 1947, for compensation under the Arizona Occupational Disease Disability Law, and the latter part of that year the Industrial Commission issued its findings and award granting to Ford compensation for total disability due to silicosis. On January 15, 1948, the employer, Phelps Dodge Corporation, hereinafter termed the petitioner, filed its application for rehearing protesting such findings and award. It was stipulated that the following agreed statement of facts was in effect a rehearing, and that the Industrial Commission should accept the statements as evidence in the case.
On March 30, 1948, the Industrial Commission issued a supplemental award and an order affirming previous findings and award. Thereafter petitioner obtained from this court a writ of certiorari which brings this action before us.
Petitioner submits the following assignments of error:
Our legislature in 1943, chapter 26, enacted the Arizona Occupational Disease Disability Law. Sections of the law presently necessary to aid in determining liability in this case are:
In order for claimant Ford to prevail he must establish by competent evidence: (1) That as an incident of his employment he was exposed to harmful quantities of silicon dioxide dust during the ten years immediately preceding his disablement for a total period of not less than 1200 work shifts in employment in this state; (2) That said exposure was harmful to him; (3) That such total disability occurred within two years from the last day the claimant worked for the employer against whom compensation is claimed; (4) that he was exposed to such harmful quantities of silicon dioxide dust for a period of at least 60 days while in said employment; (5) That such total disablement was proximately caused by exposure to which others would not have been equally exposed outside of the employment in which he was engaged; (6) That he was exposed to such silicon dioxide dust at least one day subsequent to the effective date of the occupational disease law, July 1, 1943. All of the material facts necessary to entitle claimant to an award in this case have been admitted by petitioner except that petitioner denies that there is sufficient competent evidence in the record to establish the fact that claimant had been exposed to harmful quantities of silicon dioxide dust since the effective date of the occupational disease law, i. e., since July 1, 1943.
On March 6, 1943, there became effective chapter 25, Session Laws of 1943, relating to the ventilation of mines and the prevention of hazardous dust conditions therein. Section 1 thereof reads:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bade v. Drachman
...notice must be indisputable. This being true it follows that evidence may not be received to dispute it.' Phelps Dodge Corporation v. Ford, 68 Ariz. 190, 196, 203 P.2d 633, 638 (1949) Under this doctrine, our Supreme Court has sanctioned the judicial noticing of such well-known economic fac......
-
Industrial Com'n v. Havens
...could not take judicial notice of the extraneous non-evidentiary and prejudicial items he included in his order. See Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Ford, 68 Ariz. 190, 203 P.2d 633, and Utah Nursery Co. v. Marsh, 46 Colo. 211, 103 P. In cases such as the one before us, claimants are not required to ......
-
Spettigue v. Mahoney
...which are discordant with its pronouncements. We refer to Fox v. Weissbach, 76 Ariz. 91, 259 P.2d 258 (1953); Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Ford, 68 Ariz. 190, 203 P.2d 633 (1949); Magma Copper Co. v. Naglich, 60 Ariz. 43, 131 P.2d 357 (1942). In Weissbach, our Supreme Court reached the decision th......
-
Ex Parte Riccardi
... ... La Prade, C. J., and Udall, Stanford, and ... Phelps, JJ., concur. De Concini, J., being disqualified, the ... ...