Phillip v. State
Decision Date | 14 December 2011 |
Docket Number | No. A11A2148.,A11A2148. |
Citation | 313 Ga.App. 302,11 FCDR 4065,721 S.E.2d 214 |
Parties | PHILLIP v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Ossia Phillips, pro se.
Paul L. Howard, Jr., Dist. Atty., David K. Getachew–Smith, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Ossia Phillip appeals from the trial court's order denying his motion to correct a void sentence on the basis that the motion was untimely. Because the record shows that Phillip's sentence was, indeed, void, we reverse the court's order, vacate the sentence, and remand this case for resentencing.
The record shows that, in September 2009, Phillip entered a nonnegotiated guilty plea to fourteen counts of dogfighting, OCGA § 16–12–37(b), and two counts of aggravated cruelty to animals, OCGA § 16–12–4(c). The trial court sentenced Phillip to seventeen years imprisonment, with ten to serve; the final judgment includes the phrase “each ct. [sic] concurrent.” In July 2010, Phillip filed a motion to correct a void sentence, asserting that his sentence is void because it exceeds the maximum of five years imprisonment for each count.1 He argued that, because the judgment indicates that each sentence is to run concurrently with the others, his 17–year sentence exceeds the maximum statutory punishment for the offenses and is, therefore, illegal and void. The trial court denied the motion on the basis that it was filed outside the term of court in which the sentencing occurred and, as a consequence, the court lacked jurisdiction to vacate the sentence. Phillip appeals, contending that his sentence is void and, therefore, the court erred in concluding that it lacked jurisdiction over his motion to vacate the sentence. We agree.
Generally, (Citations omitted.) Crumbley v. State, 261 Ga. 610, 611(1), 409 S.E.2d 517 (1991). Moreover, (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Zipperer v. State, 299 Ga.App. 792, 794(2), 683 S.E.2d 865 (2009). Thus, “[a] void sentence may be so held in any court where it becomes material to the interest of the parties to consider it, regardless of a lack of objection in the trial court.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id.
As shown above, the maximum prison sentence for each count of the indictment is five years. It follows that the sentence imposed on Phillip, 17 years of imprisonment with all counts to run concurrently,2 is illegal and void.3 Bass v. State, 289 Ga. 101, 709 S.E.2d 767 (2011); Crumbley v. State, 261 Ga. at 611(1), 409 S.E.2d 517. Accordingly, the trial court erred in finding that it lacked jurisdiction to consider Phillip's motion to vacate his sentence. Crumbley v. State, 261 Ga. at 611(1), 409 S.E.2d 517; Zipperer v. State, 299 Ga.App. at 794(2), 683 S.E.2d 865. Thus, the court's order is reversed, Phillip's sentence is vacated, and this case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing.
Judgment reversed, sentence vacated, and case remanded.
1. See...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Von Thomas v. State
...the applicable penal statute provides. See, e.g., Smith v. State, 322 Ga.App. 549, 551(2), 745 S.E.2d 771 (2013); Phillip v. State, 313 Ga.App. 302, 303, 721 S.E.2d 214 (2011); Crane v. State, 302 Ga.App. 422, 424(2)(b), 691 S.E.2d 559 (2010). Recidivist sentencing is no different. The exis......
-
Pittman v. State
... ... has the discretion to impose a new sentence consistent with ... statutory limits. Harrison v. State, 330 Ga.App ... 570, 574 (2) (b) (768 S.E.2d 762) (2015); ... see also Parrott, 312 Ga. at 583 (3); Phillip v ... State, 313 Ga.App. 302 (721 S.E.2d 214) (2011). As set ... out in OCGA § 17-10-3 (a) (1), the trial court was ... authorized to impose a sentence that involved incarceration ... in the county jail. Thus, once the trial court determined ... that the PDC sentence ... ...
-
Whitfield v. State
...received.18 [W]e are unable to determine whether the trial court's denial of the motion [for an out-of-time appeal] was proper under [721 S.E.2d 214] Cambron. Therefore, the trial court's order denying the motion [for an out-of-time appeal] is vacated, and this case is remanded to the trial......
-
Harrison v. State
...to consider it, regardless of a lack of objection in the trial court.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Phillip v. State, 313 Ga.App. 302, 302–303, 721 S.E.2d 214 (2011). Under OCGA § 17–10–1(a)(5)(A), the trial court “retain[s] jurisdiction throughout the period of the probated sentence......