Phillips County v. Jackson
Decision Date | 24 February 1908 |
Citation | 108 S.W. 212,85 Ark. 382 |
Parties | PHILLIPS COUNTY v. JACKSON |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Phillips Circuit Court; Hance N. Hutton, Judge reversed.
Reversed and remanded.
R. W Nicholls and John I. Moore, for appellant.
The act of May 1, 1905 (Acts 1905, p. 560), does not apply to Phillips County, hence the statute, Kirby's Digest § 6387, 6390, inclusive, controls. Under these statutes, appellee is not entitled to recover unless he shows that the defendants for whose conviction he claims fees (1) pleaded not guilty, (2) demanded a trial, and (3) secured the service of an attorney to represent them.
No officer of this State is allowed fees except such as are expressly authorized by statute. For what is necessary to authorize an allowance, see 57 Ark. 487.
Bevens & Mundt, for appellee.
Sections 6388, 6389, authorize the deputy prosecuting attorney to file information in certain cases, and make it his duty to be present and prosecute in the event of a plea of not guilty. On a plea of guilty, after information filed, the full duty of the deputy has been performed, and he is entitled to his fee.
Section 6390 was evidently intended to cover cases where information has been filed by some other person than the deputy prosecuting attorney himself.
The point involved in this appeal is whether or not a deputy prosecuting attorney is entitled to a fee for conviction in a criminal case before a justice of the peace where he filed an information, and a warrant of arrest was issued thereon, and conviction followed upon a plea of guilty. That officer filed the information in this case and appeared in the prosecution, but there was no trial, for the reason that the defendant entered a plea of guilty.
Section 6388 of Kirby's Digest authorizes deputy prosecuting attorneys to file informations before justices of the peace charging persons with the offenses of carrying weapons unlawfully, the unlawful sale of or being interested in the sale of intoxicating liquors, violation of the blind tiger act, or gambling. The two succeeding sections of the statute are as follows:
The concluding paragraph of section 6390, providing that no prosecuting attorney or his deputy shall receive any fee unless they personally appear and prosecute in a case manifestly applies to both of the two sections just...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Huddleston v. Craighead County
...Law Dictionary, 274; 9 Cyc. 865-6; 2 Words & Phrases, 1585; 109 Mass. 323; 12 Am. St. 699; 47 Ark. 444; 58 Id. 159, 167; 54 Id. 120; 85 Ark. 382; 19 220; 70 Id. 65; 94 Id. 198; 96 Id. 203; 58 Id. 167; 47 Id. 442; 61 Id. 17; 111 Id. 465; 12 Id. 122; 27 A. 867; Kirby's Digest, § 2446. Basil B......
-
Brown v. Welch
...the same as in this case, it has been held that under the above statute the deputy prosecuting attorney was not entitled to the fee. 85 Ark. 382. payment was not pleaded in the lower court but the actions were based on § 4632, C. & M. Digest, hence it is immaterial whether the payments were......