Phillips v. Clifton Mfg. Co.
Decision Date | 04 May 1944 |
Docket Number | 15644. |
Parties | PHILLIPS v. CLIFTON MFG. CO. PARHAM v. GARRETT. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Carlisle Brown & Carlisle, of Spartanburg, for appellants.
Daniel & Russell, of Spartanburg, for respondents.
This appeal involves the identical question in the two cases captioned above, and we will therefore treat them as one case.
Appellant's complaint alleged that while he was driving his automobile on a public street and road, the truck of respondent, being then operated by respondent's agents and servants, who were in the course of their employment, negligently and recklessly ran into appellant's automobile, damaging and wrecking the same to his injury in the sum of $500.
Respondent's answer set out (1) a general denial; (2) that appellant's injury was the result of his sole negligence and wilfulness (3) that his injury was the result of his contributory negligence and wilfulness, and (4) as follows:
Thereafter respondent noticed a motion for an order allowing it to interplead in the action as a party thereto, the collision insurance carrier of the appellant, Service Fire Insurance Company, upon the ground that such collision insurance carrier has paid all of appellant's damages, with the exception of $50.00, and that appellant has subrogated such collision insurance carrier to his rights in this action; that such insurance carrier is the real party plaintiff, and that a complete and final determination of the action cannot be had unless and until such collision insurance carrier is made a party thereto.
At the hearing of the above motion, appellant relied upon a written instrument designated "Loan Receipt" (conceded by respondent to be the instrument to which it referred in its fourth defense), in the following form, to wit:
After hearing counsel, Honorable Arnold R. Merchant, County Judge, "ordered that the plaintiff (appellant) do join as plaintiff the insurance carrier, Service Fire Insurance Company, under appropriate allegations showing its real relation to and interest in this cause and *** in default of which application may be made for an order of dismissal."
It is from this order that an appeal is prosecuted in this Court, the appellant stating the "Questions Involved" to be:
Agreements of the nature of the "Loan Receipt" above set out have been a common practice in business for many years, and appears to have originated in connection with...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Newco Land Co. v. Martin
... ... Bryson, 84 Mo. 664; ... Cable v. McCune, 26 Mo. 371; Ryles-Wilson & Co ... v. Shelley Mfg. Co., 93 Mo.App. 178. (8) The Current ... Fund Doctrine has been held in Missouri to apply only ... W.J. McCahan Sugar Refining ... Co., 248 U.S. 139, 39 S.Ct. 53; Phillips v. Clinton Mfg ... Co., 204 S.C. 496, 30 S.E.2d 146, 157 A.L.R. 1255 ... v. Johnson, 317 ... Mass. 485, 58 N.E.2d 849, 851[1]; Phillips v. Clifton ... Mfg. Co., 204 S.C. 496, 30 S.E. 2d 146, 157 A.L.R. 1255, ... [213 S.W.2d 515] ... and ... ...
-
Fouche v. Royal Indem. Co. of N. Y.
... ... rights of the parties to the suit can be determined.' ... Phillips v. Clifton Mfg. Co., 204 S.C. 496, 30 ... S.E.2d 146, 148, 157 A.L.R. 1255. Otherwise the matter ... ...
-
Lucas v. Garrett
... ... and the decision of this Court in Phillips v. Clifton ... Manufacturing Co., 204 S.C. 496, 30 S.E.2d 146, 157 A.L.R ... 1255. In the ... ...
-
Powers v. Calvert Fire Ins. Co.
...It could have paid the loss, as it was obligated under its policy, and preserved its right of subrogation. Phillips v. Clifton Mfg. Co., 204 S.C. 496, 30 S.E.2d 146, 157 A.L.R. 1255. The Insurance Code of this State requires in section 62, page 349 of the Acts of 1947, 45 Stat., that blank ......