Phillips v. Edmonson
Decision Date | 31 March 1853 |
Parties | PHILLIPS, Respondent, v. EDMONSON, Appellant. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
1. E. executed a bond to convey to S. a tract of land, upon payment of the purchase money in four instalments, and S. entered into possession. After two of the instalments were paid, E. recovered judgment for the third, and caused the execution to be levied on the land, which was sold and P. became the purchaser. E. was present at the sale and bid for the land. Held, P. only acquired the interest of S., which was the right to a deed upon payment of the balance of the purchase money.
Appeal from New Madrid Circuit Court.
Glover & Richardson, for appellant.
This was an agreed case, upon the following statement of facts:
Upon these facts the court below decided in favor of Phillips, and declared that all the title, right and interest of the said Edmonson in and to the land aforesaid, be vested in the plaintiff. From this judgment, Edmonson appealed to this court.
The judgment of the court below, decreeing the title to the land in Phillips, is wrong. Phillips only bought the right and title of Secoy to the land, and Secoy had the right to have the land fully conveyed to him by Edmonson, upon the payment of the purchase money. Two instalments only, had been paid; Secoy's right, therefore, was only the right to demand and have title made when the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
McNair v. Lot
...lot; McNair v. Biddle, 8 Mo. 257; 4 Kent. C. 184, n. 183; Jackson v. Hull, 10 J. R. 481; Yantis v. Broadwell, 10 Mo. 398; Phillips v. Edmonson, 17 Mo. 579; Delassus v. Patton, 19 Mo. 425; S. C. 21 Mo. 543; Lumley v. Robinson, 26 Mo. 364.) III. The supposed redemption of 1836 the court finds......
-
Thompson v. Lindsay
... ... 312; Skinner v. Stouse, 4 ... Mo. 93; Smith v. Hutchison, 61 Mo. 83; Rice v ... Bunce, 49 Mo. 231; Philipps v. Edmonson, 17 Mo ... 579; Austin v. Loring, 63 Mo. 19; Rollins v ... McIntyre, 87 Mo. 496. (4) The contract in evidence is a ... mere option to ... 382; Knollenberg v. Nixon, 171 Mo. 454; Ruppel v ... Sav. & Bldg. Ass'n, 158 Mo. 622 ... Culver, ... Phillips & Spencer for respondent ... (1) If ... the right was reserved to the vendor to mortgage the property ... only for five hundred ... ...
-
McNair v. Picotte
...or equity of redemption at law, see Jackson v. Hull, 10 John. 481; 4 Kent, C. 183, n. c. 184; Yantis v. Broadwell, 10 Mo. 398; Phillips v. Edmonson, 17 Mo. 579; Delassus v. Poston, 21 Mo. 543; S. C., 19 Mo. 425; Lumley v. Robinson, 26 Mo. 364. B. A. Hill, for defendants in error. I. The she......