Phillips v. State, 51374
| Decision Date | 05 September 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 51374,51374 |
| Citation | 374 So.2d 824 |
| Parties | Rex PHILLIPS v. STATE of Mississippi. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Lawrence D. Arrington, Hattiesburg, for appellant.
A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen. by Phillip H. Schwartz, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.
Before PATTERSON, SUGG and WALKER, JJ.
WALKER, Justice, for the Court:
Rex Phillips, appellant herein, was indicted by the Grand Jury of the Circuit Court of Forrest County, Mississippi, for the attempted bribery of a duly elected district attorney. On July 20, 1978, the appellant was found guilty as charged and was sentenced to serve a term of ten years in the State Department of Corrections and to pay a fine of $1,000. From that judgment, appellant prosecutes this appeal.
On October 20, 1977, appellant appeared at the office of Jon Marks Weathers, District Attorney of the Twelfth Circuit Court District, which embraces Forrest and Perry Counties. The appellant told Weathers that he had reopened the Highway 98 Truck Stop at Little Creek, which was located in Perry County and that he had some women and gambling in the backroom of the establishment and that he wanted to contribute to the district attorney's campaign on a regular basis in exchange for a little assistance at the truck stop, and they needed to get together.
On November 28, 1977, the district attorney called appellant at appellant's office in Richton, Mississippi, and the two agreed to meet in Hattiesburg on the following day, November 29, 1977.
On the following day, the district attorney and appellant met at the Clover Leaf Mall in the City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi, on the north side of Waldoff's Department Store. Before the meeting, Weathers was fitted with a body transmitter by agents of the Mississippi Bureau of Narcotics. The conversation and meeting between the appellant and Weathers was taped and photographed by six surveilling officers of the Hattiesburg Police Department and of the District Attorney's office. At this meeting, while the district attorney and appellant were seated in appellant's automobile, appellant gave the district attorney $150.00, and according to the district attorney, appellant handed him the money saying: "Here, this is for a month and a half; I'm going to try to get you a hundred dollars a month." Weathers further testified that he and appellant then ate lunch together, at which time appellant paid for the lunch. After lunch they departed, and Weathers stated he drove to the parking area of the YMCA where he met with the officers of the surveillance unit, at which time he turned over to Officer Smith seven-twenty dollar bills and one-ten dollar bill which had been given to him by the appellant.
On December 5, 1977, the district attorney testified that he had another conversation with appellant at the district attorney's office, which conversation was also taped through the use of a hidden transmitter located in a box on his desk. Agent Derryl Smith and Investigator Arlon Moulds were in an adjoining office listening to and taping the conversation of the appellant and district attorney. The district attorney testified that Phillips discussed a $150.00 payment that he was making to another Perry County law enforcement officer and further described the operation at the truck stop.
On February 1, 1978, at about four o'clock p. m., appellant contacted Weathers at his office again by telephone, and this conversation was recorded by placing a receiver that fit over the earpiece of the telephone. Weathers testified that appellant advised him that "they are killing my business operation," (referring to appellant's truck stop), that business had not been good, and that things had slacked off, and until things picked up, they could only handle paying what they originally agreed upon, a hundred dollars a month.
Appellant assigns four errors by the lower court as grounds for reversal....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Page v. State
...trial judge committed error when he overruled Ricky's objection to admission of the tape recording against him. Nothing in Phillips v. State, 374 So.2d 824 (Miss.1979) 7 is to the contrary. In Phillips no claim appears to have been made that the tape recorded conversation was made in violat......
-
Williamson v. State
...to show the jury any inaccuracies between the actual tapes and the officer's recollection of the conversation. See Phillips v. State, 374 So.2d 824 (Miss.1979). Again, we find that no reversible error occurred when the trial judge allowed the tapes to be played before the jury and thus find......
-
Crenshaw v. State, 57073
...(Miss.1985); Jesco, Inc. v. Shannon, 451 So.2d 694, 702 (Miss.1984); Sparks v. State, 412 So.2d 754, 757 (Miss.1982); Phillips v. State, 374 So.2d 824, 825 (Miss.1979); Isaacks v. State, 350 So.2d 1340, 1344 (Miss.1977). Gamble v. State, 254 Miss. 822, 183 So.2d 172 The purpose of an openin......
-
Sparks v. State
...are equally competent primary evidence, and that one is not to be excluded because of the existence of the other. Accord Phillips v. State, 374 So.2d 824 (Miss.1979), overruled on other The admission into evidence of the tape-recorded conversations did not render agent Spillers' testimony c......