Phillips v. State, 59284
| Decision Date | 19 March 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 59284,59284 |
| Parties | PHILLIPS v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Charles M. Jones, Billy N. Jones, Hinesville, for appellant.
Dupont K. Cheney, Dist. Atty., Kenneth R. Carswell, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
Defendant was indicted and tried for the offense of unlawful possession of marijuana with intent to distribute the same in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. A mistrial resulted. Whereupon defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal, that is, an order setting aside the mistrial and the entering of "a judgment of not guilty in his favor in accordance with his previous Motion for Directed Verdict, upon the grounds that the evidence as presented by the State failed to establish the guilt of the Defendant beyond a reasonable doubt, and the evidence failed to exclude every reasonable hypothesis except that of the guilt of the Defendant."
After a hearing the court denied the motion contending it was not an available motion under Georgia criminal procedure, citing Deen v. State, 216 Ga. 387(2), 116 S.E.2d 595. The ruling in Deen v. State, 216 Ga. 387(2), 116 S.E.2d 595, supra, merely cited the elementary rule of pleading that substance not mere nomenclature controls. See McDonald v. State, 222 Ga. 596(1), 597, 151 S.E.2d 121. The opinion in Deen v. State, 216 Ga. 387(2), 116 S.E.2d 595, supra, did state that a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict "is never available in a criminal case," and proceeded to consider it as a motion for new trial. Here a mistrial was granted, and a new trial will be necessary.
However, appeals from the lower courts may be taken only from final judgments except in certain enumerated instances. Code Ann. § 6-701 (). The language used therein is that the judgment is final "where the cause is no longer pending in the court below . . . "
Defendant's sole enumeration of error is that "(t)he Trial Court erred in dismissing the Appellant's Motion for a Directed Verdict of Acquittal Notwithstanding the Mistrial on the basis that such a motion was not available to a defendant in a criminal case."
Furthermore, Washington v. State, 243 Ga. 329, 335(4), 253 S.E.2d 719, 723. See also Tuggle v. State, 149 Ga.App. 844, 846(7), 256 S.E.2d 104. In the case sub judice, the fact that the jury could not reach a unanimous verdict is not sufficient in and of itself to serve as a basis for this court to hold that a verdict of acquittal was demanded as a...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rhyne v. State, s. A93A0505
...v. State, 191 Ga.App. 645, 382 S.E.2d 422 (1989); Blackburn v. State, 169 Ga.App. 498, 314 S.E.2d 244 (1984); Phillips v. State, 153 Ga.App. 410, 265 S.E.2d 293 (1980). In none of these cases did we address the issue of whether such a motion is valid pursuant to Georgia law. It is clear fro......
-
Dean v. State, 70405
...in a criminal case which usually forms the predicate for appellate review. See generally OCGA § 5-6-34(a)(1); Phillips v. State, 153 Ga.App. 410, 265 S.E.2d 293 (1980). However, we cannot accept the dissent's premise that the General Assembly's use of the word "sentence" in OCGA § 42-8-64 l......
-
Postell v. State
...directed verdict of acquittal is directly appealable. See McCuen v. State, 191 Ga.App. 645, 382 S.E.2d 422 (1989); Phillips v. State, 153 Ga.App. 410, 265 S.E.2d 293 (1980). However, the issue raised in these enumerations is tied to a directly appealable judgment of conviction and is appeal......
-
McCuen v. State, A89A0682
...acquittal notwithstanding mistrial, denial of such a motion is not a final judgment reviewable on direct appeal. Phillips v. State, 153 Ga.App. 410-411, 265 S.E.2d 293 (1980). Further, appellant's plea of double jeopardy will not be ripe for review by this court until the State announces it......