Phillips v. State

Decision Date20 September 1999
Docket NumberNo. S99A1100.,S99A1100.
Citation521 S.E.2d 573,271 Ga. 489
PartiesPHILLIPS v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Sullivan & Sturdivant, Harold A. Sturdivant, Michele W. Ogletree, Griffin, for appellant.

William T. McBroom III, District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, Mary Beth Westmoreland, Deputy Attorney General, Paula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Angelica M. Woo, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

BENHAM, Chief Justice.

This appeal is from Raquel Twan Phillips's conviction of murder and possession of a firearm during commission of a crime.1 The evidence adduced at trial showed that earlier on the evening of the shooting involved here, Phillips and a group of friends argued with the victim, Pamela Burden, and one of her sisters. When Phillips produced a pistol during the argument, Burden offered to fight if Phillips would put away the gun. Phillips refused and threatened to kill someone that night, whereupon Burden retreated into a nearby house. When Burden and her sister emerged, Phillips and her friends were standing across the street, from which location Phillips taunted Burden. When another of Burden's sisters arrived, Burden began to approach Phillips and her friends. Phillips produced her pistol again; Burden offered again to fight if Phillips would put down the gun; and Phillips shot Burden in the forehead and then fled. A spent shell casing found at the scene was determined to come from a 9mm pistol found more than a block away. Although Phillips claimed at trial that the gun fired accidentally, a weapons examiner found that pistol to fire normally. Phillips sought to introduce into evidence Burden's conviction for aggravated assault, but the trial court ruled that the necessary prima facie case had not been made and excluded the evidence.

1. The evidence adduced at trial and set out above was sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find Phillips guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of murder and possession of a firearm during commission of a crime. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); Lee v. State, 270 Ga. 626, 513 S.E.2d 225 (1999).

2. Phillips enumerates as error the trial court's exclusion of evidence that Burden had previously been convicted of aggravated assault. Before evidence of a victim's prior violent acts can be admitted, the defendant must, among other requirements, make a prima facie showing of justification. Lewis v. State, 268 Ga. 83(2), 485 S.E.2d 212 (1997). "`To make this prima facie showing, the defendant must show that the victim was the aggressor, the victim assaulted the defendant, and the defendant was honestly trying to defend himself.' [Cit.]" Haynes v. State, 234 Ga.App. 272(2), 507 S.E.2d 151 (1998). Phillips did not make that showing....

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Adams v. State, S99A1091.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 20, 1999
  • Graham v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • January 14, 2002
    ...was the aggressor, the victim assaulted the defendant, and the defendant was honestly trying to defend himself. Phillips v. State, 271 Ga. 489(2), 521 S.E.2d 573 (1999). Appellant's testimony that he thought the victim had a gun and that he fired at the victim to scare him did not establish......
  • Oliver v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 29, 2014
    ...with defendant after defendant brandished a gun and demanded that victim apologize for an earlier altercation); Phillips v. State, 271 Ga. 489, 490(2), 521 S.E.2d 573 (1999) (holding that defendant failed to make prima facie showing that victim assaulted her or that defendant was honestly t......
  • Milner v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • January 22, 2007
    ...the aggressor; (2) the victim assaulted the defendant; and (3) the defendant was honestly trying to defend himself. Phillips v. State, 271 Ga. 489(2), 521 S.E.2d 573 (1999). As found by the trial court, the defendant did not produce sufficient evidence to make this showing. Despite the vict......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT