Phillips v. Wilson
Decision Date | 06 April 1923 |
Docket Number | No. 23282.,23282. |
Citation | 298 Mo. 186,250 S.W. 408 |
Parties | PHILLIPS et al. v. WILSON et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Butler County; Almon Ing, Judge.
Ejectment by Lattie Phillips and others against Doyle Wilson and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.
Gregory & Holtzendorff, of Hazen, and Cope & Tedrick and E. G. Hammons, all of Poplar Bluff, for appellants.
Henson & Woody, of Poplar Bluff, for respondents.
I. Appeal from the circuit court of Butler county. Ejectment for 171½ acres of land in said county. Answer a general denial, except admission that defendants are in possession. Further answering, defendants state that they and the plaintiff Luella Williams are the owners in fee simple, subject to the dower interest of defendant Dovie Wilson, of said property; that plaintiffs Lattie Phillips and J. F. Holtzendorff claim adversely, but have no rights in said property; wherefore defendants pray the court to determine and quiet title between the parties, according to the statute in such cases made and provided.
The case was tried before the court without a jury. No instructions were asked or given. The court found a verdict, and rendered judgment that defendants and plaintiff Luella Williams were the owners of the property, as claimed by defendants, and the other plaintiffs had no interest therein. Plaintiffs duly appealed to this court.
The evidence showed that both parties claimed through Warren Wilson as a common source of title. He acquired ownership by deed dated March 27, 1902, and recorded March 11, 1904.
Plaintiffs' evidence tended to show that Warren Wilson moved onto said farm in October, 1902; that he was accompanied by the defendant Doyle Wilson, who lived with his as his wife; that they lived together as husband and wife, and always claimed privately and publicly, to be husband and wife, and were so reputed generally in said community, from the time they moved there in 1902 until the time of his death in 1915; that when they moved to said farm they had no children, but afterwards five children were born to them, the oldest of whom was 18 years old at the time of the trial, and the youngest 8 years, the oldest being married to Henry Wisecarver. The children were all born and raised on this farm, and all of them, except the married one, lived with their mother on the farm at the time of the trial. No one in the neighborhood, until this suit was instituted, ever questioned that they were man and wife, and always referred to and treated them as such.
The plaintiff Lattie Phillips testified for plaintiffs, and It was admitted by defendants that she was married to Warren Wilson in 1895 in Prairie county, Ark.; that the plaintiff Luella Williams was her daughter and the daughter of Warren Wilson, as the fruit of that marriage. Said Lattie Phillips then testified:
She and her husband, Warren Wilson, lived in Prairie county, Ark., and separated in 1902, when Wilson went to Missouri. The separation took place in June, 1902. Before the separation Wilson sold all the live stock and personal property he had on the farm. He also took all the household goods, except a sewing machine, cookstove, and some old chairs, which the witness received. He also gave her $10 in money, and she went back to reside at her mother's home in said county. Wilson realized about $900 from the property he sold. Wilson left their home in Arkansas with Samanthia Johnson (defendant Dovie Wilson).
On cross-examination the witness testified:
The deposition of F. L. Grady was taken and read on behalf of the plaintiffs. He testified that he was county clerk of Prairie county, Ark., and had charge of the marriage records of that county; that such records contain a marriage license of J. Warren Wilson to Lattie Raper; that exhibit A attached to his deposition is a certified copy of that record. Said Exhibit A contained copies of four separate documents, to wit: (1) A marriage affidavit; (2) a bond for marriage license; (3) a marriage license; and (4) a certificate of marriage. They showed that on the 8th of September, 1895, there was a ceremonial marriage before a justice of the peace of Prairie county, Ark., between Z. Warren Wilson, age 40 years, and Miss Lattie Raper, age 26 years.
The deposition of G. C. Stock was read by plaintiffs. He testified that he was chief deputy clerk of the circuit and chancery courts of Prairie county, Ark., and as such had charge of the records of said courts; that he examined the divorce records of said courts, going back over a period of 30 years, and found that no suit was ever instituted for a divorce by. Warren Wilson against Lattie Wilson or by Lattie Wilson against Warren Wilson, and no decree of divorce ever entered for or against either of said parties, according to the records of said courts; that the chancery court was the court which had jurisdiction in divorce cases.
Several other witnesses, relatives of the parties, testified for plaintiffs that Warren Wilson and Samanthia Johnson lived a short time together at Wilson's former home in Arkansas, and then left together.
Allye Macon testified for plaintiffs:
"I am deputy circuit clerk of this county, and as such have charge of the divorce records of the county.
Defendants here admitted that there was no record in said Butler county of any marriage between Samanthia Johnson or Doyle Johnson and Warren Wilson.
Defendants, to sustain the issues on their part, offered in evidence a certified copy of the marriage certificate of J. G. Phillips and Lattie Wilson, certified by the county and probate clerk of Prairie County, Ark., under his band and official seal. This certificate contained four documents: (1) An affidavit; (2) a bond for marriage license; (3) a marriage license; and (4) a certificate of marriage. It showed a ceremonial marriage before a justice of the peace of Prairie county, Ark., on the 11th day of September, 1904, between J. G. Phillips, age 50, and Mrs. Lattie Wilson, age 38. The "affidavit of marriage" was as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Boillot v. Income Guar. Co.
... ... 5 C.J.S. 550; O'Donnell v. B. & O.R. Co., 26 S.W. (2d) 929, 324 Mo. 1097; King v. Mauer, 286 S.W. 100, 315 Mo. 318; Phillips v. Wilson, 250 S.W. 408, 298 Mo. 186; Davis v. Alexander, 183 S.W. 563; Schell v. F.E. Ransom Coal & Grain Co., 79 S.W. (2d) 543; Bender v. Midwest ... ...
-
Boillot v. Income Guar. Co.
... ... 5 C.J.S. 550; O'Donnell v. B. & O.R. Co., 324 Mo. 1097, 26 S.W. (2d) 929; King v. Mauer, 315 Mo. 318, 286 S.W. 100; Phillips v. Wilson, 298 Mo. 186, 250 S.W. 408; Davis v. Alexander, 183 S.W. 563; Schell v. F.E. Ransom Coal & Grain Co., 79 S.W. (2d) 543; Bender v. Midwest ... ...
-
Huttig v. Brennan
... ... S.W.2d 815; City of Brookfield v. McCollum, 5 S.W.2d ... 10; Craig v. Rhodes, 298 S.W. 756; Phillips v ... Wilson, 298 Mo. 186, 250 S.W. 408. After carefully ... studying the record, we have set out, at considerable length, ... the substance of ... ...
-
Boillot v. Income Guar. Co.
... ... 5 C. J. S. 550; O'Donnell v. B. & O. R. Co., 324 ... Mo. 1097, 26 S.W.2d 929; King v. Mauer, 315 Mo. 318, ... 286 S.W. 100; Phillips v. Wilson, 298 Mo. 186, 250 ... S.W. 408; Davis v. Alexander, 183 S.W. 563; ... Schell v. F. E. Ransom Coal & Grain Co., 79 S.W.2d ... 543; Bender ... ...