Photovision Itern., Inc. v. Thayer
Decision Date | 21 January 1997 |
Citation | 235 A.D.2d 467,652 N.Y.S.2d 1002 |
Parties | PHOTOVISION INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Respondents, v. Donald O. THAYER, Jr., et al., Appellants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Moritt, Hock & Hamroff, L.L.P., Hempstead (Robert M. Tils, of counsel), for appellants.
Williams & Williams, Rochester (Mitchell T. Williams, of counsel), for respondents.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, the defendants appeal, as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kohn, J.), as denied those branches of their motion which were for a default judgment on the first and second counterclaims set forth in their answer based upon the plaintiffs' failure to reply.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the defendants' contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying those branches of their motion which were for a default judgment on their first and second counterclaims, and in permitting the plaintiffs to serve a late reply to those counterclaims. Although the failure to serve a timely reply was apparently caused by law office failure, considering the existence of a possible meritorious defense to the counterclaims, the lack of willfulness on the part of the plaintiffs, and the strong public policy in favor of resolving claims on the merits, we agree, as a matter of discretion, that the plaintiffs' delay in serving a reply was properly excused (see, Polizzotto v. Ultra Express Coach, 220 A.D.2d 568, 633 N.Y.S.2d 972; Robles v. Grace Episcopal Church, 192 A.D.2d 515, 595 N.Y.S.2d 824; see also, Ajamian v. Troy Savings Bank, 225 A.D.2d 592, 639 N.Y.S.2d 540; Berman v. Szpilzinger, 172 A.D.2d 304, 568 N.Y.S.2d 386; Sunrise Assocs. v. Pilot Realty Co., 170 A.D.2d 214, 565 N.Y.S.2d 108).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pizza Plus of Rockaway, Inc. v. Arverne Associates, 2007 NY Slip Op 34323(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 12/20/2007)
...on its merits. White v. Incorporated Village of Hempstead, 41 A.D.3d 709 (2d Dept. 2007); Beizer v. Funk, supra; Photovision Intl. v. Thayer, 235 A.D.2d 467 (2d Dept. 1997). Here, Pizza Plus failed to demonstrate either a reasonable excuse for its delay in serving a reply to the counterclai......
- Prince v. Inverary