Pickens v. Plattsmouth Land and Investment Co.
Decision Date | 24 March 1891 |
Citation | 48 N.W. 473,31 Neb. 585 |
Parties | WILLIAM H. PICKENS, APPELLEE, v. PLATTSMOUTH LAND AND INVESTMENT CO. ET AL., APPELLANTS |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
APPEAL from the district court for Cass county. Heard below before CHAPMAN, J.
Reversed in part and affirmed in part.
O. H Ballou, for appellant, cited: Irish v. Lundin, 28 Neb. 84.
J. B Strode, contra, cited, contending that the Improve-Company was estopped by the conduct of its officers from denying the liens: Buckstaff v. Dunbar, 15 Neb. 114; McCormick v. Lawton, 3 Id., 149.
This action was brought by the appellee in the district court of said county to foreclose a mechanic's lien for the erection of certain buildings on the property of the appellant described as the northwest quarter of the southeast quarter of section one, town twelve north, range thirteen east, sixth P. M., in Cass county, Neb. The amount of the claim was $ 800.25. The appellants set up in their brief that the Plattsmouth Land and Improvement Company were the legal owners of the title to a tract of land near Plattsmouth amounting to two hundred acres, as appeared of record in Cass county, the Plattsmouth Investment Company at the time holding an unrecorded and undisclosed parol contract for the purchase of the said real estate. Appellee Pickens contracted with the Plattsmouth Investment Company, the equity holders, for the erection of certain buildings, known as the Park House, etc., and built the same on said land, the Plattsmouth Land and Improvement Company not being a party to said contract. Lien was filed and suit brought to foreclose and sell the buildings and also the lands on which they were placed. Decree for plaintiff ordering sale of premises, including realty, from which decree this appeal is taken by the Plattsmouth Land and Improvement Company.
The counsel for appellee replied that the counsel for appellants, in his statement of the case says that the Plattsmouth Investment Company held an unrecorded and undisclosed parol contract for the purchase of the real estate described in the petition, at the time the contract for the erection of a Park House, mentioned in the petition, was made. To this we assent; but we do not assent to his further statement that the contract for the erection of said Park House was made with the Plattsmouth Investment Company, the equity holder, alone, and that the Plattsmouth Land and Improvement Company, the holder of the legal title, was not a party to said contract. The evidence in this case warrants us in stating that the Plattsmouth Land and Improvement Company took such action, through its officers, in procuring the appellee to enter into the contract and to erect the building as to make it a party to the contract.
The cause was tried to the court and the following decree was entered: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial