Pictorial Review Co. v. Pate Bros.
Decision Date | 05 February 1916 |
Docket Number | (No. 8326.) |
Citation | 185 S.W. 309 |
Parties | PICTORIAL REVIEW CO. v. PATE BROS. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Erath County Court; A. P. Young, Judge.
Action by the Pictorial Review Company against J. J. Pate and B. B. Pate, doing business as Pate Brothers, begun in justice's court and appealed by plaintiff to county court. From a judgment there dismissing the action, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
W. W. Moores, of Stephenville, for appellant. J. T. Daniel, of Stephenville, for appellees.
Appellant, plaintiff below, filed in the justice court of Erath county a verified account against defendants, amounting to $106.15, and covering items for patterns, postage, etc. In the justice court the cause was dismissed upon the ground that the contract relied on was prohibited by article 5313, Revised Statutes 1895, and especially subdivisions Nos. 3 and 5 of said article now incorporated in article 7796, Vernon's Sayles' Texas Civil Statutes, said article being a part of what is known as the "Anti-Trust Law." Upon appeal to the county court, judgment was likewise entered, sustaining defendants' demurrers to plaintiff's petition and dismissing the action at the cost of plaintiff. The action of the court upon defendants' demurrers was not taken until the evidence had been heard; the judgment reciting as follows:
Plaintiff excepted to the action of the court in overruling its motion for new trial and gave notice of appeal to this court.
The contract introduced by plaintiff, and upon which it relies to sustain its cause of action, is as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hubb-Diggs Co. v. Mitchell
...et al., 162 S. W. 394; Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Mayberry, 193 S. W. 199; Armstrong v. Rawleigh Medical Co., 178 S. W. 582; Pictorial Review v. Pate Bros., 185 S. W. 309; Rawleigh Med. Co. v. Fitzpatrick, 184 S. W. 549; Rawleigh Med. Co. v. Gunn, 186 S. W. 385; Newby v. W. T. Rawleigh Co., 19......
-
State v. Ford Motor Co.
...Co., Tex.Civ.App., 194 S.W. 1175; W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Fitzpatrick, Tex.Civ.App., 184 S.W. 549; Pictorial Review Co. v. Pate Bros., Tex.Civ.App., 185 S.W. 309; W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Mayberry, Tex.Civ.App., 193 S.W. 199; Hubb-Diggs Co. v. Mitchell, Tex. Civ.App., 231 S.W. 42......
-
W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Mayberry
...the approval of the Court of Appeals for the Eighth District in Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Gunn, 186 S. W. 385. See, also, Pictorial Review Co. v. Pate Bros., 185 S. W. 309, by this court. It will also be noted that a writ of error was refused (170 S. W. xviii) in Watkins Med. Co. v. Johnson, ......