Pierce v. Capital Cities Communications, Inc.
Decision Date | 07 February 1977 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 74-1248. |
Citation | 427 F. Supp. 180 |
Parties | Alfred R. PIERCE v. CAPITAL CITIES COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and Richard Kellman. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Henry Thomas Dolan, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.
Elihu A. Greenhouse, Gregory M. Harvey, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.
OPINION AND ORDER
Alfred R. Pierce, formerly a Commissioner of the Delaware River Authority and the Mayor of Camden, New Jersey, has brought this diversity action against defendants Capital Cities Communications, Inc., owner and operator of television broadcasting station WPVI-TV, and Richard Kellman, a television reporter employed by WPVI-TV, for an alleged defamation which occurred on November 20, 1973 when WPVI-TV televised a special program entitled "Public Bridges and Private Riches".
Plaintiff seeks a total of four million dollars in damages, including two million for punitive damages.
Defendants have filed a motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties have submitted affidavits, briefs, a transcript of the program, a videotape of the program which was shown at oral argument and several depositions. For the reasons stated herein, the defendants' motion for Summary Judgment is granted.
In granting defendants' motion, I recognize that Alfred R. Pierce may feel that careful and accurate reporting could have given him a better and more favorable image. I also know that with the extraordinary powers of the media, their occasional failure to pursue the highest standard of accuracy has caused many honorable and responsible persons to decline any options to serve in public office because they are not willing to have their honest efforts vilified by omissions, excesses or distortions. But, this issue has been answered by the United States Supreme Court which has held that as a matter of Constitutional law a public official may not recover:
. . . damages for a defamatory falsehood relating to his official conduct unless he proves that the statement was made with `actual malice' — that is, with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not. New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 279-280, 84 S.Ct. 710, 726, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964).
By this Constitutional standard, the defendants, as to their comments on Pierce, win — but merely by a scintilla. I hope that the media will never believe that a Constitutional right which precludes them from liability is a professional justification for sloppy reporting.1 Obviously, I am aware of the problem of compressing complex factual data in a flashy television news setting. But hopefully, because of its instant and extraordinary impact with its abbreviated form, reporters should pursue an even higher level of responsibility. The defendant station's slogan "ACTION NEWS" should not become a synonym for "partially inaccurate news." The public deserves a better standard with or without the station's Constitutional immunity.
Mr. Pierce was appointed a commissioner of the Delaware River Port Authority by the Governor of New Jersey and served from June 4, 1962 until May 11, 1970; from 1969 until May 11, 1970 he served as Chairman of the Authority Plaintiff's Complaint ¶ 12. Plaintiff asserts that prior to the defendants' broadcast he ". . . was a person of good name, credit and reputation, both personally and professionally, and deservedly enjoyed the esteem and good opinion of his friends, acquaintances, business and professional associates, professional clients." He further alleges that he ". . deservedly enjoyed the reputation of being honest, competent, upright and responsible. . . ." Complaint ¶ 9
In approximately mid-August of 1973 defendant Kellman was authorized by his superior at Capital Cities, Mel Kampman, to prepare and produce a program to explore the activities of the Delaware River Port Authority and the performance of the Chairman, Ralph Cornell; this program was part of a series of news broadcasts on issues of public concern. Kellman Deposition, pp. 23, 24 and 39.
Fourteen statements made on the WPVI-TV broadcast form the basis of the plaintiff's defamation action:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pierce v. Capital Cities Communications, Inc.
...acquired during discovery, the defendants moved for summary judgment. The district court, in an opinion and order dated February 7, 1977, 427 F.Supp. 180, held that the application of the principles enunciated in New York Times required a grant of summary judgment on behalf of the defendant......
-
Huckabee v Time Warner Entertainment
...416 S.E.2d 237, 244 (W. Va. 1992); see also Brasslett v. Cota, 761 F.2d 827, 843 (1st Cir. 1985); Pierce v. Capital Cities Communications, Inc., 427 F. Supp. 180, 186 (E.D. Pa. 1977), aff'd, 576 F.2d 495 (3d Cir. 1978); Diesen v. Hessburg, 455 N.W.2d 446, 453-54 (Minn. 1990)(dicta). This st......
-
Perez v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
...question is whether that selection is made with a view toward dissemination of false information. See Pierce v. Capital Cities Communications, Inc. (E.D.Pa.1977), 427 F.Supp. 180, 185-186, affirmed (C.A. 3, 1978), 576 F.2d 495, certiorari denied (1978), 439 U.S. 861, 99 S.Ct. 181, 58 L.Ed.2......
-
Brasslett v. Cota, 84-1555
...while it might arguably have rendered the statements erroneous, could hardly be deemed malicious. Cf. Pierce v. Capital Cities Communications, Inc., 427 F.Supp. 180, 185-86 (E.D.Pa.1977) (disparity by omission between what party knew and what he said does not constitute actual In conclusion......