Pierce v. Jernigan
Decision Date | 26 November 1928 |
Docket Number | 27458 |
Citation | 118 So. 898,151 Miss. 758 |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Parties | PIERCE v. JERNIGAN. [*] |
APPEAL from circuit court of Lowndes county, HON. J. I. STURDIVANT Judge.
Action by C. W. Jernigan against J. A. Pierce. Judgment for plaintiff on appeal from justice court, and defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded.
Frierson & Weaver, for appellant.
Loving & Loving, for appellee.
Jernigan, the appellee here, sued the appellant, Pierce, before Vandiver, a justice of the peace, in which court there was a judgment for the appellee, from which appellant appealed to the circuit court, in which court the verdict and judgment was in favor of the appellee, and appellant prosecutes his appeal to this court.
There was a motion by appellee to dismiss the appeal here because the record was not certified to the circuit court by the justice of the peace, and we determined to dispose of the motion on the submission of the case.
The justice of the peace made no effort to certify his record, and there is no substantial compliance with the requirement of section 65, Hemingway's Code of 1927 (section 85 of the Code of 1906).
In resistance of the motion, counsel for the appellant urges that a copy of the judgment, with entry on the docket, the name of the justice of the peace being attached thereto, is a substantial certificate, as required by the above section.
Section 65 requires that the justice of the peace from whose decision an appeal is taken shall transmit to the clerk of the circuit court a certified copy of the record of the proceedings. It may be that this is a copy, but it is not a certified copy; and this question is at rest in this court, and the case of Calhoun v. State, 86 Miss. 553, 38 So. 660, was necessarily and essentially overruled prior to the decision by this court of the case of Rodgers v. City of Hattiesburg, 99 Miss. 639, 55 So. 481, in which case the Calhoun case was specifically overruled, and we held that the certificate must be attached to the record of the proceedings, in order to confer jurisdiction upon the circuit court; and since jurisdiction was wanting in the circuit court, there was none in this court.
Judge ANDERSON, as the organ of the court, said:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Adams v. Day, 38131
...in the latter court, filed in the circuit court, is not authenticated by the certificate of the justice of the peace. Pierce v. Jernigan, 151 Miss. 758, 118 So. 898; Rogers v. City of Hattiesburg, 99 Miss. 639, 55 So. 481; Ball v. Sledge, 82 Miss. 747, 35 So. 214; Travillion v. State, 206 M......
-
Land v. Coffey
...necessary jurisdiction to try the case de novo. McPhail v. Blaun, 47 So. 666; Ball v. Sledge, 35 So. 214, 82 Miss. 747; Pierce v. Jernigan, 118 So. 898, 151 Miss. 758. Griffith, J. An action of replevin was instituted by appellant in the court of a justice of the peace against appellee for ......
- American National Life Ins. Co. v. Johnson