Pierce v. Pierce

Decision Date23 September 1916
Docket Number689.
Citation89 S.E. 1045,145 Ga. 886
PartiesPIERCE v. PIERCE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

A libel for divorce brought by a husband, based on cruel treatment, is sufficient to withstand a general demurrer, where it alleges that the defendant has at times slapped the face of the libelant, and "would have done other and serious violence to petitioner, had he not held her by reason of his superior physical strength; that the defendant would call petitioner vile names, and that this caused petitioner's peace of mind and nervous system to become greatly impaired and his general health involved, and that to have continued living with the defendant would have been to place petitioner's life in jeopardy; that out of fear of bodily harm, and out of fear for his life, he separated himself from the defendant; * * * and that petitioner had never condoned any of the alleged acts of cruelty of the defendant." Miller v. Miller, 139 Ga. 282, 77 S.E. 21.

Error from Superior Court, Fulton County; J. T. Pendleton, Judge.

Action between S.E. Pierce and J. M. Pierce. There was a judgment for the latter, and the former brings error. Affirmed.

Edgar Latham, of Atlanta, for plaintiff in error.

Nalley & Scott, of Atlanta, for defendant in error.

BECK, J.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except GILBERT, J., not presiding.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Phinizy v. Phinizy
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 19, 1922
    ... ... course I could use them to advantage ... 3. The usual bills for February will be paid by me as ... heretofore ... 4. The Pierce-Arrow landaulet will be left in the garage for ... your use and benefit, and you can employ any chauffeur that ... you see fit to serve you in that ... ...
  • Wilkinson v. Wilkinson
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1924
    ...v. Stoner, 134 Ga. 368, 67 S. E. 1030; Miller v. Miller, 139 Ga. 282, 77 S. E. 21; Ford v. Ford, 146 Ga. 164, 91 S. E. 42; Pierce v. Pierce, 145 Ga. 886, 89 S. E. 1045. Under the allegations of the petition as amended, we are of the opinion that the petition alleged such acts of cruel treat......
  • Wilkinson v. Wilkinson
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1924
    ... ... Stoner, 134 Ga. 368, 67 S.E. 1030; ... Miller v. Miller, 139 Ga. 282, 77 S.E. 21; Ford ... v. Ford, 146 Ga. 164, 91 S.E. 42; Pierce v ... Pierce, 145 Ga. 886, 89 S.E. 1045. Under the allegations ... of the petition as amended, we are of the opinion that the ... petition ... ...
  • Morris v. Morris
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • July 10, 1947
    ...Cureton, 132 Ga. 745, 65 S.E. 65; Stoner v. Stoner, 134 Ga. 368, 67 S.E. 1030; Miller v. Miller, 139 Ga. 282, 77 S.E. 21; Pierce v. Pierce, 145 Ga. 886, 89 S.E. 1045; Ford v. Ford, 146 Ga. 164, 91 S.E. 42; v. Wilkinson, 159 Ga. 332, 125 S.E. 856. An intention to wound, mentally or physicall......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT