Pilger v. Torrence

Citation42 Neb. 903,61 N.W. 99
PartiesPILGER ET AL. v. TORRENCE ET AL.
Decision Date04 December 1894
CourtSupreme Court of Nebraska

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Syllabus by the Court.

When one against whom a judgment has been rendered seeks the affirmative aid of a court of equity to relieve him from that judgment, he must aver and prove that he had a meritorious defense to the action in which judgment was rendered. This is true, even though the judgment be void, provided at least its invalidity does not appear on the face of the record.

Appeal from district court, Madison county; Allen, Judge.

Suit by A. P. Pilger and another against Victor K. Torrence and another to enjoin the collection of a judgment. There was a judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. Reversed.Griggs & Rinaker and J. A. Smith, for appellants.

Barnes & Tyler, for appellees.

IRVINE, C.

A judgment was rendered in the district court of Pierce county in favor of Torrence, and against the plaintiffs in this case. A transcript of this judgment was filed in Madison county, and this action was brought against Torrence and the sheriff of Madison county to enjoin the enforcement of the judgment, it being claimed that the judgment had been entered without jurisdiction. An injunction was granted, and the defendants appeal.

It is not necessary to consider the questions raised as to the validity of the judgment. The plaintiffs do not, in their petition, allege that they had any meritorious defense to the action. When one against whom a judgment has been rendered seeks the affirmative aid of a court of equity to relieve him from that judgment, he must aver and prove that he had a meritorious defense to the action in which judgment was rendered. This is true even though the judgment be void, provided at least its invalidity does not appear on the face of the record. Osborn v. Gehr, 29 Neb. 661, 46 N. W. 84;Janes v. Howell, 37 Neb. 320, 55 N. W. 965;Langley v. Ashe, 38 Neb. 531, 56 N. W. 720;Gould v. Loughran, 19 Neb. 392, 27 N. W. 397;Proctor v. Pettit, 25 Neb. 96, 41 N. W. 131;Winters v. Means, 25 Neb. 242, 41 N. W. 157;Lininger v. Glenn, 33 Neb. 187, 49 N. W. 1128;Petalka v. Fitle, 33 Neb. 756, 51 N. W. 131;Wilson v. Shipman, 34 Neb. 573, 52 N. W. 576. Reversed and cause dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Ollis v. Orr
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • February 10, 1899
    ...Am. St. Rep. 494, 55 N.W. 965; White v. Crow, 110 U.S. 183, 4 S.Ct. 71; Massachusetts Ben. Assn. v. Lohmiller, 74 F. 23; Pilger v. Torrence, 42 Neb. 903, 61 N.W. 99; John V. Farwell Co. v. Hilbert, 91 Wis. 437, 65 172; Crocker v. Allen, 34 S.C. 452, 27 Am. St. Rep. 831, 13 S.E. 650. QUARLES......
  • Meyer v. Wilson
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • February 1, 1906
    ... ... 573, ... 52 N.W. 576, 33 Am. St. 660, 662; Janes v ... Howell (1893), 37 Neb. 320, 55 N.W. 965, 40 Am. St ... 494; Pilger v. Torrence (1894), 42 Neb ... 903, 61 N.W. 99; Winters v. Means (1888), ... 25 Neb. 241, 41 N.W. 157, 13 Am. St. 489; Spooner v ... Leland ... ...
  • Pilger v. Torrence
    • United States
    • Nebraska Supreme Court
    • December 4, 1894

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT