Pilot Life Ins. Co. v. Cudd
Decision Date | 29 December 1945 |
Docket Number | 15791. |
Citation | 36 S.E.2d 860,208 S.C. 6 |
Parties | PILOT LIFE INS. CO. v. CUDD. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Carlisle, Brown & Carlisle, of Spartanburg, for appellant.
Osborne Butler & Moore, of Spartanburg, and Smith, Wharton & Jordon, of Greensboro, for respondent.
This action was commenced in the Spartanburg County Common Pleas Court in March, 1944, by the service of summons and complaint. Plaintiff seeks to recover on the ground of alleged mistake, as alleged in the complaint, the sum of $1,013.36, paid to defendant as beneficiary under a policy on the life of her nephew and foster son, Lewis Edward Cudd, of which the sum of $1,000 was death benefit and $13.36 was premium refund.
Defendant answered, admitting the payment, denying mistake, and alleging that the payment was voluntary and was in the nature of a compromise settlement by plaintiff, as set forth in the answer.
The cause came on for trial on January 16, 1945, before Honorable William H. Grimball, presiding Circuit Judge, and a jury.
At the conclusion of all the evidence, motion was made for judgment in favor of each party. After argument his Honor directed a verdict in plaintiff's favor for $1,013.36. Later during the term, his Honor filed an order granting judgment for plaintiff accordingly, and judgment has been duly entered in favor of plaintiff thereon.
In due time defendant served notice of intention to appeal to the Supreme Court from the rulings, orders, decrees, and judgments of the presiding Judge and the cause now comes before this Court on the transcript of record and exceptions which for all practical purposes raise the following issues:
(1) Was such payment a material mistake of fact or error of judgment on the part of the company?
(2) Was such payment a voluntary one?
(3) Was such payment a compromise settlement by plaintiff?
The respondent, Pilot Life Insurance Company, issued its policy dated April 12, 1936, for $1000 on the life of Lewis Edward Cudd, naming the insured's aunt and adopted mother as beneficiary; on or about November 18, 1942, the insured sailed from Ceylon as a member of the Merchant Marine aboard the American Export Lines vessel, Swaokla; on January 16 1943, Elizabeth Blackwell Cudd who was married to the insured in April, 1942, received the following letter from the War Shipping Administration:
On February 9, 1943, the Maritime War Emergency Board issued the following Certificate of Presumptive Death:
At the request of appellant the American Export Lines wrote her under date of February 26, 1943, as follows:
'We wish we were in a position to advise you something more definite, but under the circumstances, and owing to the lack of information, it is impossible for us to do so.
'We have asked the Maritime War Emergency Board to forward to us an individual certificate of presumptive death and upon receipt of same we will have it photostated, forwarding the original and the photostat to Mrs. Cudd in order to enable her to collect whatever insurance Mr. Cudd might have carried.'
'Note: The letter is captioned 'M. V. Sawokla' and is signed by the Manager of Claims and Insurance Division under the following: 'The United States of America War Shipping Administration, America Export Lines, Inc., Agents.'
Sometime during the Spring of 1943, appellant communicated this information to the local agent of the respondent and he in turn gave such information as he had to the home office who under date of April 8, 1943, wrote American Export, Inc., advising of the existence of the policy in question and that respondent had been advised by appellant that the insured had been missing since November, 1942, and made request for 'Assistance to us in establishing proofs of death of this person or of determining his present status,' as a result of which respondent received the following reply:
'Letter to plaintiff from American Export Lines, Inc., New York, N. Y., dated April 13, 1943 as follows:
'We acknowledge receipt of your letter of April 8 in respect to your above caption.
'If we can be of any further assistance to Mrs. Cudd in collecting the outstanding life insurance with your company, please let us know.'
The local agent inquired of the beneficiary whether or not she had received a Certificate of Presumptive Death and learned it was in the possession of the wife, thereupon respondent communicated with the the Maritime War Emergency Board stating that it had been advised of the death of the insured and requested 'a copy of the original Certificate of Presumptive Death' and received same under date of May 8, 1943, which was based on the original order of the Board dated February 9, 1943, together with their letter advising: 'We believe this will be sufficient for you to pay the beneficiary the amount of the policy carried by you on the deceased.' As a result of this death, claims were signed and filed by the appellant. Respondent then issued its check for $1,013.36 covering the face amount of the policy plus a premium payment of $13.36 which had been paid after the date of presumptive death. This check was delivered to the beneficiary who endorsed it and received payment therefor, June 7, 1943, respondent having at the time of delivery of the check taken up the original policy.
On August 20, 1943, the U. S. Coast Guard wrote the wife, Mrs. Elizabeth Cudd; said letter being signed by Lieutenant of the Coast Guard, title 'Chief, Merchant Marine Personnel Records and Welfare Section' as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
West v. West
... ... We do ... not see the necessity of detailing the life of the ... respondent, Mrs. Dorothy Josephine West, and thus making a ... ...