Pisacreta v. Minniti

Decision Date25 October 1999
Citation265 A.D.2d 540,697 N.Y.S.2d 160
PartiesPAUL A. PISACRETA, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>JOSEPH A. MINNITI et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Santucci, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Smith, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is reversed, as a matter of discretion, with costs, and the motion is granted.

To successfully oppose a motion for leave to enter a judgment based upon the failure to serve an answer or appear in an action, the defendants must demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default and a meritorious defense (see, Gurreri v Village of Briarcliff Manor, 249 AD2d 508).

In opposing the plaintiff's motion, the defendants, an attorney and his professional corporation, submitted an affirmation of the individual defendant instead of an affidavit, in an effort to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the delay and a meritorious defense. Because the individual defendant is a party to the action, his submission of an affirmation instead of an affidavit was improper, and its contents should have been disregarded by the Supreme Court, thereby rendering the opposing papers insufficient to defeat the plaintiff's motion (see, CPLR 2106; Slavenburg Corp. v Opus Apparel, 53 NY2d 799; Lauer v Rapp, 190 AD2d 778). In any event, the defendants failed to demonstrate that they had a reasonable excuse for the delay in answering or appearing in the action (see, Palermo v Rodriquez, 255 AD2d 567).

Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Schwartz v. Sayah
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 19 Abril 2011
    ...26 Ct. St. Asso.s., LLC, 58 A.D.3d 610, 611, 872 N.Y.S.2d 144;Finger v. Saal, 56 A.D.3d 606, 607, 870 N.Y.S.2d 32;Pisacreta v. Minniti, 265 A.D.2d 540, 697 N.Y.S.2d 160). The parties' remaining contentions are without merit.MASTRO, J.P., FLORIO, BELEN and CHAMBERS, JJ.,...
  • Tribeca Equity Partners L.P. v. Savitt
    • United States
    • New York Civil Court
    • 24 Junio 2014
    ...the submission of his affirmation instead of an affidavit is improper (Slavenburg Corp. v. Opus Apparel, 53 N.Y.2d 799, 801;Pisacreta v. Minniti, 265 A.D.2d 540;Board of Managers of Ocean Terrace Towne House Condominium v. Lent, 148 A.D.2d 408, 409).* * * *Accordingly, the Court will not co......
  • Davoudi v. Orthopaedic Assocs. of Manhasset
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 6 Diciembre 2018
    ... ... v Cean ... Owens, LLC, 110 A.D.3d 872 (2d Dept. 2013); ... Schwartz v Sayah, 83 A.D.3d 926 (2d Dept ... 2011); Pisacreta v Joseph A. Minniti, P.C., 265 ... A.D.2d 540 (2d Dept. 1999) ...          The ... medical records reflect a history of orthopaedic care ... ...
  • Halley v. Servedio
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Term
    • 23 Mayo 2017
    ...an attorney, improperly submitted affirmations rather than affidavits in support of his motion (see CPLR 2106 ; Pisacreta v. Joseph A. Minnitti, P.C., 265 A.D.2d 540 [1999] ). An objection as to form, however, is waived if it is not raised in the motion court (see Scudera v. Mahbubur, 299 A......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT