Pitcher v. Sutton

Decision Date22 May 1934
Citation264 N.Y. 638,191 N.E. 603
PartiesLe Roy C. PITCHER et al., Appellants, v. John M. SUTTON, Respondent.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from a judgment, entered July 10, 1933, upon orders of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department (238 App. Div. 291, 264 N. Y. S. 488) reversing upon the law and facts a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court at an Equity Term, and directing, upon new findings, the entry of judgment dismissing the complaint. The action was brought in equity to set aside, on the ground of fraud, a deficiency judgment entered against the plaintiffs in an action to foreclose a first mortgage upon real property, which plaintiffs had assigned to defendant by an instrument guaranteeing payment thereof. The Appellate Division, in dismissing the complaint, held that the fraudulent acts, which plaintiffs relied upon to support the judgment below, had occurred more than ten years before the commencement of this action, and that the action was therefore barred by the statute of limitations.

Seymour Bernstein and Charles B. Bechtold, both of Rochester, for appellants.

John M. Sutton, in pro. per.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

POUND, C. J., and CRANE, LEHMAN, O'BRIEN, HUBBS, and CROUCH, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Brown v. Lockwood
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 22, 1980
    ...Dairy Co. v. Little Falls Nat. Bank, Sup., 54 N.Y.S.2d 345, 349; Pitcher v. Sutton, 238 App.Div. 291, 293, 264 N.Y.S.2d 488, affd. 264 N.Y. 638, 191 N.E. 603) and is replaced by a requirement that the plaintiff prove the existence of a fiduciary or confidential relationship warranting the t......
  • McCoy v. Goldberg, No. 89 Civ. 8151 (WCC).
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • January 4, 1993
    ...v. Sutton, 238 A.D. 291, 292-93, 264 N.Y.S. 488 (4th Dept.1933), modified on other grounds, 240 A.D. 754, 265 N.Y.S. 929, aff'd 264 N.Y. 638, 191 N.E. 603; Birnbaum v. Birnbaum, 73 N.Y.2d 461, 466-67, 541 N.Y.S.2d 746, 748, 539 N.E.2d 574, 576 (1989); Gordon v. Bialystoker Ctr. & Bikur Chol......
  • Rieser v. Baltimore & OR Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • June 30, 1954
    ...889, certiorari denied, 317 U.S. 674, 63 S.Ct. 79, 87 L.Ed. 541; Pitcher v. Sutton, 238 App.Div. 291, 264 N.Y.S. 488, affirmed, 264 N.Y. 638, 191 N.E. 603. 25 Austrian v. Williams, 2 Cir., 198 F.2d 697, certiorari denied, 344 U.S. 909, 73 S.Ct. 328, 97 L.Ed. 701. 26 Higgins v. Crouse, 147 N......
  • Abbate v. Abbate
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • July 27, 1981
    ...Dairy Co. v. Little Falls Nat. Bank, Sup., 54 N.Y.S.2d 345, 349; Pitcher v. Sutton, 238 App.Div. 291, 293, 264 N.Y.S. 488, affd. 264 N.Y. 638, 191 N.E. 603) and is replaced by a requirement that the plaintiff prove the existence of a fiduciary or confidential relationship warranting the tru......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT