Pitt v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
Decision Date | 05 October 1932 |
Docket Number | 51. |
Parties | PITT v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE R. CO. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Superior Court, Nash County; Cranmer, Judge.
Action by Hattie M. Pitt, administratrix of Tom Pitt, deceased against the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company. From a judgment of nonsuit, plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Evidence of railroad's liability, where traveler in buggy approached parallel tracks in daytime, saw flagman at crossing, watched freight to right, and was struck by passenger train from left, held insufficient for jury.
This was a civil action to recover damages for wrongful death. The evidence tended to show that the defendant operates a line of railroad running through the town of Elm City. The public highway crosses the tracks at grade. There are two main tracks at the crossing, the east track being the northbound and the west track being the southbound. The evidence further disclosed that the defendant maintained a watchman at said crossing.
On or about December 6, 1930, at about 4 o'clock in the afternoon, the plaintiff's intestate, riding in a buggy and driving a mule, undertook to cross the tracks. At the time, a freight train of defendant was approaching the crossing from the south going north. One eyewitness to the killing testified as follows:
Another eyewitness said: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
... ... contributory negligence is such as to bar a recovery. The ... pertinent authorities would seem to suggest an affirmative ... answer. Temple v. Hawkins, 220 N.C. 26, 16 S.E.2d ... 400; Hampton v. Hawkins, 219 N.C. 205, 13 S.E.2d ... 227; Pitt v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R., 203 N.C ... 279, 166 S.E. 67; Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line R ... R., 202 N.C. 1, 161 S.E. 541; Batchelor v. Atlantic ... Coast Line R. R., 196 N.C 84, 144 S.E. 542, 60 A.L.R ... 1091; Harrison v. North Carolina R. R., 194 N.C ... 656, 140 S.E. 598; Elder v ... ...
-
Ramey v. Southern Ry. Co., 667
...v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co., supra; McCrimmon v. Powell, supra; Miller v. North Carolina R. R. Co., supra; Pitt v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co., 203 N.C. 279, 166 S.E. 67; Harrison v. North Carolina R. R. Co., 194 N.C. 656, 140 S.E. 598; Coleman v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co., supra......
-
Oldham v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.
...time, the injury might not have occurred. Shepard v. R. R., supra; Finch v. R. R., 195 N.C. 190, 141 S.E. 550. The case of Pitt v. R. R., 203 N.C. 279, 166 S.E. 67, cited and relied upon by defendants, is distinguishable by reason of different fact situations. In the cited case, the plainti......