Planters' Mut. Ins. Ass'n v. Harris
Decision Date | 31 October 1910 |
Citation | 131 S.W. 949 |
Parties | PLANTERS' MUT. INS. ASS'N v. HARRIS et al. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Union County; Geo. W. Hays, Judge.
Proceedings by the Planters' Mutual Insurance Association, a claimant of the estate of G. M. Wright, deceased, for judgment against C. A. Harris and others, the sureties on the bond of the administrator. From a judgment of the circuit court sustaining an order of the probate court refusing to render judgment against the sureties, the claimant appeals. Reversed and remanded.
R. L. Floyd, for appellant. Patterson & Green and Mahoney & Mahoney, for appellees.
The appellant was a creditor of the estate of G. M. Wright, deceased, and its claim had been duly allowed by the probate court in the regular course of the administration of said estate. It obtained an order from said court adjudging that J. H. Walsh, the administrator of said estate, should pay to appellant a certain proportion of its probated claim, together with the same proportion of other claims of the same class. Having exhausted its remedy against the administrator without success of collection it sued out of said probate court a scire facias against the sureties upon his bond as such administrator, under section 158 of Kirby's Digest, and thereby sought to obtain judgment against said sureties for the amount of its claim which had been ordered paid. The probate court refused to render judgment against said sureties and the claimant appealed to the circuit court, and that court sustained the order of said probate court, refusing to render said judgment against the sureties of said administrator. The claimant has appealed to this court.
In January, 1901, J. H. Walsh duly qualified as administrator of the estate of Geo. M. Wright, deceased, with the will annexed, and thereafter filed a petition in the probate court asking for an order to sell the land belonging to said estate in order to pay the debts of certain named creditors of said estate in pursuance of the directions contained in the will of said testator. At its April term, 1901, the probate court made the following order of sale:
In pursuance of said order the administrator sold said land and thereafter made report of such sale to the probate court. Thereupon the probate court at its April term, 1902, made an order duly approving the sale of said land. The order confirming said sale is as follows:
There was no order made by the probate court directing the administrator to pay the debts of J. W. Anderson and J. C. Wright referred to in the above order of sale, unless it be considered that the said order of sale contained such direction. The administrator made no report to said court that he had made such payment to such creditors, and no order was ever made by said court approving such payment. At a later year during the progress of said administration, the probate court ordered said administrator to file a settlement, which was done. The probate court passed upon this settlement at its July term, 1906, and restated the same. It charged the administrator with the proceeds of the sale of said land and with interest thereon, and this appears to have been all the assets of said estate which came to the hands of said administrator. It then provided for the payment of the cost of the administration and directed that the remainder of the amount charged against the administrator be paid to all the creditors of the estate whose claims had been duly probated. This amount thus found due from the administrator was only sufficient to pay to each creditor a proportionate part of his claim, and the probate court found the specific sum that was thus payable to each creditor. It then ordered and adjudged that the administrator pay out of the funds of the estate thus charged to him to each of said named creditors the specified sum found due to each of them. The amount thus ordered to be paid to appellant was $147.38.
In the same order it appears that the bondsmen of said J. H. Walsh, administrator, excepted to the ruling and judgment of said probate court and asked an appeal to the circuit court, which was granted. But said appeal to the circuit court was never actually taken or perfected. The administrator failed or refused to pay to appellant the sum thus ordered paid to it by said probate court; and after exhausting the remedy against the administrator as provided for in section 157 of Kirby's Digest, the appellant sued out of said probate court a scire facias against the sureties of said administrator and sought by this proceeding to obtain a judgment against said sureties for the amount of its claim ordered to be paid.
It is urged by counsel for appellees that the administrator had, under the directions of the will of the decedent, applied to the probate court for an order to sell the land for the purpose of paying the debts of J. W. Anderson and J. C. Wright as provided for in the will, and that the probate court had made the above order of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rothwell v. Knight
... ... 950; Planter's Ass'n v ... Harris, (Ark.) 131 S.W. 949; Hershey Chocolate Co ... v ... ...
- Planters' Mutual Insurance Association v. Harris