Plumly v. Plumly
Decision Date | 03 March 1948 |
Docket Number | No. 11803.,11803. |
Citation | 210 S.W.2d 177 |
Parties | PLUMLY v. PLUMLY. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Forty-Fifth District, Bexar County; C. K. Quin, Judge.
Action by Jane Jackson Plumly, now Dawson, against Henry Curtis Plumly for divorce, wherein a decree was rendered providing for support and maintenance of two minor children. From an order overruling defendant's motion for modification, defendant appeals.
Affirmed.
Woodville J. Rogers, of San Antonio, for appellant.
Kampmann & Burney, of San Antonio, for appellee.
This is an appeal from an order of the 45th District Court of Bexar County, Texas, overruling the motion of Henry Curtis Plumly for a modification of a decree of divorce rendered in said court in cause No. F-17164, styled Jane Jackson Plumly (now Dawson) v. Henry Curtis Plumly, on May 29, 1944, wherein provision was made for the support and maintenance of two minor children, Henry Curtis Plumly, Jr., and Ben Jackson Plumly. The motion was based upon the proposition that one of said children since the decree of the court was rendered had attained his majority, quit school, had married and had moved to South America to accept employment.
The original decree of divorce reads, in part, as follows:
At this point in the proceedings the parties entered into the following property settlement agreement, the pertinent parts of which read as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Traveler's Insurance Company v. United States
...U.S. 543, 545, 71 S.Ct. 399, 95 L.Ed. 523 (1951). 27 Burnaman v. Heaton, 150 Tex. 333, 240 S.W.2d 288, 291 (1951); Plumly v. Plumly, 210 S.W.2d 177, 179 (Tex.Civ.App. 1948) error 28 Erstling v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co., 255 F.2d 93, 95 (5th Cir. 1958); The Ansaldo San Giorgio......
-
Boman v. Gibbs
...418 S.W.2d 588 (Tex . Civ.App. refused n.r.e.); Everett v. Everett, 309 S.W.2d 893 (Tex.Civ.App. refused n.r.e.); Plumly v. Plumly, 210 S.W.2d 177 (Tex . Civ.App. dismissed); 25 Tex.Jur. 387, Sec. 25, 26. When an agreed judgment is pleaded a contract is likewise pleaded. Milner v. Schaefer,......
-
Alexander v. Alexander
...writ history; Everette v. Everette, Tex.Civ.App., 309 S.W.2d 893; Gago v. Raines, Tex.Civ.App., 268 S.W.2d 724, n. w. h.; Plumly v. Plumly, Tex.Civ.App., 210 S.W.2d 177, writ ref. n. r. e.; Bean v. S. W. Bell Telephone Co., et al., Tex.Civ.App., 164 S.W.2d 412, writ ref., want of merit; Pos......
-
Rich v. Con-Stan Industries, CON-STAN
...the court stated the following: '* * * In this State an agreed judgment is regarded as being in the nature of a contract. Plumly v. Plumly, Tex.Civ.App., 210 S.W.2d 177, and authorities therein cited; 25 Tex.Jur. 387, Secs. 25, 26. When an agreed judgment is pleaded a contract is likewise p......