POBRESLO V. JOSEPH M. BOYD CO.
Decision Date | 09 January 1933 |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN
1. Voluntary assignments for the benefit of creditors are not inconsistent with the purposes of the federal Bankruptcy Act, though
subject to be set aside under it by timely petition of creditors. P. 526.
2. Statutory provisions in Wisconsin regulating voluntary assignments for the ratable benefit of all creditors of the assignor, and forbidding that any creditor gain priority by attachment or garnishment, but not providing for discharge of the assignor or requiring his release by creditors who would participate in the distribution, held not in conflict with the Bankruptcy Act. International Shoe Co. v. Pinkus, 278 U. S. 261, distinguished. P P. 523-525.
210 Wis. 20, 242 N.W. 725, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment upholding an assignment for the benefit of creditors and directing the dismissal of a garnishment proceeding brought by a nonassenting creditor.
Chapter 128 of the Wisconsin Statutes, 1929, regulates and controls voluntary assignments for the benefit of creditors and also contains provisions relating to the discharge of insolvent debtors. By this appeal, we are called on to decide whether, as construed below, the provisions of that chapter which relate to voluntary assignments for the benefit of creditors, and especially a clause contained in § 128.06, conflict with the National Bankruptcy Act. The clause declares:
The Boyd Company, a Wisconsin corporation, March 23, 1931, made a voluntary assignment of all its property to assignees for the benefit of its creditors. They immediately took possession, and the Circuit Court of Dane county, on the same day, assumed jurisdiction, declaring in its order that it did so pursuant to c. 128. Appellant, a nonassenting creditor, brought suit against the assignor and prayed judgment for more than ,500. September 1, 1931, she instituted garnishment proceedings against the assignees, asserting that the assignment was void because of failure to comply with c. 128 in several particulars, and because that chapter was repugnant to the Bankruptcy Act. Thereafter, the assignor amended the assignment to authorize the judge of the circuit court, in case of resignation of the assignees, to appoint a trustee. The assignees resigned, and the court appointed appellee Samp as sole trustee. He answered the garnishment and admitted that he had the property conveyed by the assignment, but denied that he had possession or control of any property in which the assignor had an interest. Appellant, having recovered judgment against the assignor for ,645, moved for judgment against the garnishees. The court found that the assignees had received property belonging to the assignor in excess of appellant's judgment, and had transferred the same to the trustee, and ordered that it be applied to satisfy the judgment. The supreme court reversed, and directed that the garnishee action be dismissed. 242 N.W. 725.
In view of the construction theretofore put upon c. 128 by the state supreme court, it is evident that the assignment did not have the effect of instituting proceedings contemplating discharge of assignor from its debts.
In Voluntary Assignment of Tarnowski, 191 Wis. 279, 210 N.W. 836, the supreme court declared that, as to all matters comprehended within the Bankruptcy
Act, the state insolvency laws had been by it completely superseded, and said (p. 283):
"The statutes of this state relating to the subject of bankruptcy are suspended during the existence of the federal Bankruptcy Act, and . . . such statutes afford the courts of this state no power or authority to discharge debtors from their debts."
In Hazelwood v. Olinger Building Department Stores, 205 Wis. 85, 236 N.W. 591, 592, the court pointed out that the Wisconsin statute under consideration is essentially different from the Arkansas statute before us in International Shoe Co. v. Pinkus, 278 U. S. 261, and, speaking through Chief Justice Rosenberry, said:
In the case at bar, the court again declared that the provisions in c. 128 that apply to such voluntary assignments are severable from those that relate to the discharge of insolvent debtors. It reiterated that the federal
Act superseded the latter. And it held that, as there was an attempt to make an assignment for the benefit of creditors, the quoted clause of § 128.06 prevented garnishment, even though the assignees had failed to follow some of the procedural details prescribed by c. 128.
There is slight need to refer more specifically to the differences between this case and International Shoe Co. v. Pinkus, supra. There, the proceedings in the chancery court were under the state insolvency law (Crawford & Moses' Dig., §§ 5885-5893), and not under the law governing voluntary assignments for the benefit of creditors. Id., §§ 486-493. Upon the entry of the shoe company's...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kesler v. Department of Public Safety, Financial Responsibility Division, State of Utah
...state insolvency laws, or other laws designed to affect the debtor-creditor relationship as such. E.g., Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co., 287 U.S. 518, 53 S.Ct. 262, 77 L.Ed. 469 (1933); International Shoe Co. v. Pinkus, 278 U.S. 261, 49 S.Ct. 108, 73 L.Ed. 318 (1929). See Williston, The Effe......
-
Deitz v. Ford (In re Deitz)
...the power to impair the obligation of contracts, and this the states were forbidden to do.”). Cf. Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co., 287 U.S. 518, 524, 53 S.Ct. 262, 77 L.Ed. 469 (1933) ( “[T]he discharge of a bankrupt from his debts constitutes the very essence of the Bankruptcy Law ...”). 3.......
-
Mader's Store for Men, Inc., In re
...assignments, unless so put aside, should be regarded as not inconsistent with the purposes of the federal Act. . . ." 287 U.S., at 525, 526, 53 S.Ct., at 264. Chapter 128 was substantially modified by ch. 431, Laws of 1937, which added, in sec. 128.06, an involuntary "action for the appoint......
-
In re Newport Offshore Ltd.
...will be superseded by bankruptcy." 283 U.S. at 331, 51 S.Ct. at 470.26 The last case in the quartet, Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co., 287 U.S. 518, 53 S.Ct. 262, 77 L.Ed. 469 (1933), considered whether the Bankruptcy Act suspended operation of Wisconsin's statutory assignment for the benefit......
-
Corporate Governance, Bankruptcy Waivers, and Consolidation in Bankruptcy
...the Constitutional decision to confer on Congress the power to make uniform laws concerning bankruptcies. Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co., 287 U.S. 518, 524-25 (1933); Stellwagon v. Clum, 245 U.S. 605, 613-15 (1918); Sherwood Partners, Inc. v. Lycos, Inc., 394 F.3d 1198, 1201 (9th Cir. 2005)......
-
A New Bankruptcy Subchapter for Institutions of Higher Education: A Path but not a Destiny.
...transfers by a debtor, as insolvency laws. Miller, Framework, supra note 11, at 440-41 (conforming Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co., 287 U.S. 518 (1933); Int'l Shoe Co. v. Pinkus, 278 U.S. 261, 265 (1929); and Stellwagen, 245 U.S. at (238) The sale of an IHE is also an option, even without sa......
-
Vivian Luo, a Preference for States? the Woes of Preempting State Preference Statutes
...(1883); Stellwagen v. Clum, 245 U.S. 605, 613 (1918); Int'l Shoe Co. v. Pinkus, 278 U.S. 261, 265 (1929); Pobreslo v. Joseph M. Boyd Co., 287 U.S. 518, 524 (1933). 132 See, e.g., Boese, 108 U.S. at 385 (finding that the Bankruptcy Act suspends all laws that provide for discharge, but that a......