Poehler v. Lonsdale, 24933.
Decision Date | 06 June 1939 |
Docket Number | No. 24933.,24933. |
Citation | 129 S.W.2d 59 |
Parties | POEHLER v. LONSDALE et al. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; Harry F. Russell, Judge.
Action by Edward F. Poehler against John G. Lonsdale and another, trustees in bankruptcy of St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, for injuries received by plaintiff when his automobile struck a coal car obstructing a highway crossing. Judgment for plaintiff on a verdict in the sum of $1,896, and the defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
J. W. Jamison, A. P. Stewart, and C. H. Skinker, Jr., all of St. Louis, for appellants.
Joseph N. Hassett and Vernon L. Turner, both of St. Louis, for respondent.
SUTTON, Commissioner.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in a collision of his automobile with a coal car in defendants' train.
The trial, with a jury, resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $1,896, and defendants appeal.
Error is assigned by defendants here for the refusal of their instruction in the nature of a demurrer to the evidence. The assignment is put on the grounds, (1) that the evidence as to defendants' negligence was insufficient to take the case to the jury, and (2) that under the evidence most favorable to plaintiff, and under the physical facts in the case, plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.
The collision occurred between one and two o'clock a. m. on December 15, 1934, at the intersection of the railway tracks, which run north and south, with Gravois Road, which runs east and west, in St. Louis County. Plaintiff was driving his model A Ford coupe east on Gravois Road. Miss Venita Nelson was riding in the coupe with him.
Concerning the collision and the attendant circumstances plaintiff testified as follows:
Venita Nelson testified as follows:
All the witnesses agreed that the night was dark and cloudy, though the trainmen stated there was no fog.
The evidence shows that Gravois Road was a four-lane road paved with concrete and was about fifty feet wide. It carried a vast amount of vehicular traffic. It was one of the main arteries of travel leading into the City of St. Louis, and was designated and known as highway 30. It was a direct cutoff from South St. Louis to U. S. highway 66 and 67. The railroad crossing where the collision occurred was just a few miles from the St. Louis city limits. There were no gates or signal lights or bells of any kind at the crossing. There was a wooden crossarm on the north side of the highway about twelve feet west of the tracks and about ten feet north of the north curb of the highway. There was no light on it. There was not any crossarm or warning signal of any kind at the intersection on the south side of the road. There was no light of any kind to light up the intersection or the train or cars standing across the intersection. There was a little shanty for the watchman at the southeast corner of the intersection. The railroad tracks were level with the concrete pavement, and there was nothing about the construction of the tracks to indicate their presence to a traveler approaching them from the west. The pavement was level and smooth across the tracks. For a distance of about three hundred feet there was no grade approaching the tracks from the west, the pavement being practically level west of the tracks for that distance. The pavement was light. There was evidence of a state highway sign up on the road three hundred to six hundred feet west of the intersection showing a cross with red buttons, located in a ditch at the side of the road about ten feet south of the curb. It was about three feet high and below the level of the pavement. A deputy sheriff testified that no stranger going over the road approaching the railroad tracks from the west would know that the railroad tracks were there, "unless he noticed this road sign, which very few people noticed." Plaintiff testified that he did not see it. The deputy sheriff further testified that this was a dangerous crossing, and that ordinarily there was a heavy vehicular traffic over this highway all day long and continuing up to three o'clock in the morning. He also stated that if one were not familiar with the road he would not know that there was a railroad track there, that there was nothing there to indicate to the traveler that he was coming to a railroad crossing. One of defendants' witnesses testified as to the heavy traffic passing over this crossing, stating that it came from both ways "like a swarm of bees."
The freight car with which plaintiff's automobile collided was a coal car loaded with coal. The car was painted black. Prior to the collision the locomotive had proceeded north over the crossing and had stopped. The coal car was the fourth car from the locomotive. It was thirty-six feet long, inside measure. It was standing across the pavement, the front trucks to the north of the center line of the pavement and the rear trucks at the south edge of the pavement. The bottom of the coal car was three to three and one-half feet above the pavement, and slightly lower than the height of the top of the hood of the coupe. So that there was nothing between the trucks underneath the coal car to obstruct the beams from the headlights of the coupe as it approached the coal car. After the collision the hood of the coupe was wedged under the coal car partwise, three or four feet south of the front trucks, that is, between the front and rear trucks. The coupe was partly towards the center of the road but still on the south side of the center of the road. The whole front part of the coupe was damaged. The top of the hood was crushed back almost to the windshield.
The defendants' watchman was on duty at the time of the collision. He was to the east of the train, with his lanterns, one red and one white. He was to the north of the center of the highway, and was so positioned with respect to the train that his lights were not visible to plaintiff as he approached the crossing.
All of the testimony of the train crew shows that the bell of the locomotive was shut off after it crossed over the highway, and that the bell was not rung nor the whistle sounded after the locomotive passed over...
To continue reading
Request your trial