Pollock v. City of Albany
| Decision Date | 18 September 1953 |
| Docket Number | No. 1,No. 34692,34692,1 |
| Citation | 77 S.E.2d 579,88 Ga.App. 737 |
| Parties | POLLOCK v. CITY OF ALBANY |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. The defendant's oral renewal and insistence upon its demurrers as filed to the original petition, where the plaintiff amended his petition before the demurrers were ruled upon, was sufficient to renew the general grounds of demurrer so that they covered the petition as amended.
2. The petition, in which the plaintiff sought recovery for personal injuries caused by the negligent maintenance of a stadium by the defendant municipality, failed to show that the stadium was operated by the city, under charter authority, as an independent commercial venture, but showed that the stadium was owned and operated by the city as a public recreational facility, in the exercise of the city's governmental function of providing for the welfare of its citizens; and the court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer to the petition.
Leon J. Pollock brought this action for damages for personal injuries against the City of Albany, in the City Court of Albany, on February 23, 1953. The City of Albany filed general and special demurrers to the petition on March 9, 1953. The plaintiff, on April 10, 1953, offered amendments to his petition, which were allowed, subject to objection and demurrer, before the demurrers already filed were ruled upon. At the hearing on April 10, 1953, the defendant's counsel orally stated that the defendant's demurrers were renewed to the petition as amended, and the court sustained the general demurrers.
The petition as amended alleged substantially the following: The defendant is a municipal corporation, chartered under the laws of Georgia, and owns a stadium within its corporate limits. This stadium is equipped by the defendant solely for the viewing of spectator sports, such as football and baseball games, and is surrounded by a wall so that the public cannot view games within the stadium without paying an entrance fee. There are ticket windows located along the wall, where tickets are sold to those desiring to view the games conducted within the stadium. The stadium is equipped with permanent stands on the south side, and with semi-permanent stands or bleachers on the north, and seats about 10,000 persons. All of the football games played in Albany in 1952 by the Albany High School football team (six games) were played in the stadium.
The defendant has appointed a stadium committee to manage its stadium; the committee is controlled by and is an agency of the defendant city. For all high-school football games played in the stadium, an entrance fee of $1.25 per person is charged. Crowds of from four to ten thousand persons attended the games played in 1952. The stadium committee receives entrance fees paid by the public. The stadium is equipped with metal doors which are kept locked and barred, denying entrance to the public except when athletic events are held within the stadium, at which times the public is admitted upon payment of the prescribed fee.
The stadium is not operated or equipped in such a manner as to induce or invite the public to use it for the furtherance of public health, recreation, or well-being, but is operated on a commercial basis, in such a manner that pecuniary gain and profit inures to the defendant as a direct and primary result. The public pays taxes for the operation and maintenance of the stadium, and is locked out except at such times as the stadium committee sees fit to admit the public upon payment of an entrance fee. The stadium contains no swings, swimming pool, shade trees, nor anything that would tend to facilitate its use by the public in furtherance of public health, recreation, and well-being. Incidental profit is derived by the defendant from the operation of concessions within its stadium, but direct profit is derived by the defendant from gate receipts, by virtue of authority vested in the defendant under the terms of section 1 of its charter, providing in part: '* * * and shall be able in law * * * to sell and convey, rent or lease, and otherwise manage and dispose of all property * * *,' and under other terms and provisions of its charter. The defendant has charter authority to operate its stadium primarily for profit and for pecuniary gain, and does so operate its stadium.
The stadium is not operated in furtherance of the health and well-being of the high-school football team, as the team could derive as much health and well-being from playing elsewhere without spectators or in the presence of non-paying spectators.
There are certain footways within the stadium along which spectators must walk in order to reach their seats. Upon entering the north side of the stadium, a spectator must walk along a path to the bottom of the stadium bowl and then proceed along a walkway in front of the bleachers and and finally ascend to a seat in the bleachers. In 1952, the plaintiff attended the football game between the teams of Albany High School and Richmond Academy in the stadium. After paying his entrance fee, the plaintiff entered the stadium on the north side and descended to the bottom of the stadium along the regular walkway. Toward the east side of the stadium and near the northeast corner of the bleachers, there was a hole or excavation in the plaintiff's course along the walkway provided. The hole was in shadows cast by the bleachers, and the plaintiff was unaware of its presence until he stepped into the hole and was injured.
The solid, packed condition of the excavated dirt near the hole indicated that it had existed a sufficient length of time for the defendant to have covered it or erected barriers around it for the protection of the public. The defendant has exclusive control of the care and maintenance of its municipal stadium, and had notice of the existence of this excavation and had ample time to correct this defect in a public way. The defendant was negligent in digging the hole, in failing to cover it before exposing the public to the danger created, in failing to erect a barrier to warn the plaintiff of the excavation, and in failing to exercise the required degree of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Oxford v. Shuman
...209(6), 124 S.E.2d 432, and, since this is true, it must follow that a general demurrer may be renewed orally. Pollock v. City of Albany, 88 Ga.App. 737(1), 77 S.E.2d 579. A special demurrer must always be in writing. Martin v. Gurley, 74 Ga.App. 642(1), 40 S.E.2d 787. 1 Since this is true ......
-
Sheley v. Board of Public Ed. for City of Savannah and Chatham County
...immunity is good and demanded a judgment for the defendant. Nabell v. City of Atlanta, 33 Ga.App. 545, 126 S.E. 905; Pollock v. City of Albany, 88 Ga.App. 737, 77 S.E.2d 579; Smith v. Board of Education of City of Marietta, 119 Ga.App. 441, 167 S.E.2d 615; cf. City of Brunswick v. Barrett, ......
-
Cleghorn v. City of Albany
... ... See, e.g., Pollock v. City of Albany, 88 Ga.App. 737, ... 77 S.E.2d 579; Watkins v. City of Toccoa, 55 Ga.App. 8, 189 S.E. 270; Petty v. City of Atlanta, 40 Ga.App. 63(4), 148 S.E. 747. These cases do not control for they ignore the possibility of a purely public function ... City of Atlanta v ... ...
-
National Sur. Corp. v. Hunt, 39155
...89 S.E.2d 908. (However, the renewal or reinsistence upon the demurrer may be done orally as well as in writing. Pollock v. City of Albany, 88 Ga.App. 737, 740, 77 S.E.2d 579). Thus, the sustaining of the general demurrers to the original petition did not dispose of or have the effect of di......