Ponte v. DaSilva
| Decision Date | 07 March 1983 |
| Citation | 446 N.E.2d 77,388 Mass. 1008 |
| Parties | Helena M. PONTE et al. 1 v. Silverio DaSILVA et al. 2 |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Norman R. McCarthy, Jr., Westport (Kenneth Ponte, North Dartmouth, with him), for plaintiffs.
Francis J. Lynch, III, Brockton, for defendants.
Before HENNESSEY, C.J., and LIACOS, ABRAMS, LYNCH and O'CONNOR, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
Helena M. Ponte seeks damages for personal injuries sustained when she fell on the driveway of her home. Her husband, Joseph, seeks to recover for consequential damages and loss of consortium. Trial was held before a judge of the District Court, who found for the plaintiffs. The Appellate Division of the District Courts vacated the findings and ordered that the complaint be dismissed. This is the plaintiffs' appeal from that decision. We affirm the order of the Appellate Division.
We summarize the facts set forth in the judge's memorandum of decision. The plaintiffs own residential premises in the city of New Bedford adjoining residential premises owned by the defendants. A large willow tree is located on the defendants' property, the trunk of which is about four feet from the plaintiffs' driveway. Branches overhang the driveway. Between 1976 and September, 1978, when Helena fell, leaves, sap, and branches fell onto the driveway due to the natural characteristics of the tree, which was not diseased. The condition grew progressively worse. Prior to the accident the plaintiffs complained to the defendants about the clogging of their gutters and swimming pool filter, the debris on their motor vehicles, and the danger of bodily injury. They urged removal of the tree. About ten days before the accident the plaintiffs' attorney wrote to the defendants that Joseph Ponte had fallen on the debris and warned that similar incidents would occur if the tree were not removed. Helena fell on the driveway of the Ponte residence on September 9, 1978, due to sap and leaves that had come from the tree.
The defendants argue that the facts found by the judge do not warrant a finding for the plaintiffs. The Appellate Division agreed, as do we. This case is distinguishable from Kurtigian v. Worcester, 348 Mass. 284, 203 N.E.2d 692 (1965), involving injury as a result of a limb being blown from a decayed tree on adjoining premises. The failure of a landowner to prevent the blowing or dropping of leaves, branches, and sap from a healthy tree onto a neighbor's...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Melnick v. C.S.X. Corp.
...of actions at law, which would be likely to be innumerable and, in many instances, purely vexatious." See also, Ponte v. DaSilva, 388 Mass. 1008, 446 N.E.2d 77 (1983). Several other courts have limited a landowner to a self-help remedy. In Schwalbach v. Forest Lawn Memorial Park, 687 S.W.2d......
-
Abbinett v. Fox
...76 A.L.R. 1109 (1932) (roots of tree on adjoining property repeatedly clogged sewer line on neighbor's land); Ponte v. Da Silva, 388 Mass. 1008, 446 N.E.2d 77 (1983) (plaintiff was injured after falling in her driveway due to sap, leaves and branches that had fallen from neighbor's tree); s......
-
Shiel v. Rowell
...demanding that the overhanging branches be cut back.A District Court judge dismissed Shiel's claims as precluded by Ponte v. DaSilva, 388 Mass. 1008, 1008, 446 N.E.2d 77 (1983) (individual whose 480 Mass. 107property is injured by neighbor's healthy tree has no cause of action against lando......
-
Boyle v. Leech
...a nuisance, neither should such debris from a tree that does not encroach onto neighboring property.¶19 Finally, in Ponte v. DaSilva, 388 Mass. 1008, 446 N.E.2d 77 (1983), the plaintiff suffered injury when she slipped on branches that had fallen onto her property from a neighbor’s overhang......