Poromon v. Evans, 959

Decision Date04 October 2019
Docket Number959,CAF 18–00436
Citation112 N.Y.S.3d 366,176 A.D.3d 1642
Parties In the Matter of Sunny B. POROMON, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Monique T. EVANS, Respondent–Appellant, and Evelyn Adams, Now Known as Evans, Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

176 A.D.3d 1642
112 N.Y.S.3d 366

In the Matter of Sunny B. POROMON, Petitioner–Respondent,
v.
Monique T. EVANS, Respondent–Appellant, and Evelyn Adams, Now Known as Evans, Respondent.

959
CAF 18–00436

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Entered: October 4, 2019


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (TIMOTHY S. DAVIS OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT–APPELLANT.

HANDELMAN, WITKOWICZ & LEVITSKY, LLP, ROCHESTER (STEVEN M. WITKOWICZ OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER–RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND CURRAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

176 A.D.3d 1642

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order that modified the prior order of custody and visitation by, inter alia, granting petitioner father sole legal custody of the subject child.

Contrary to the mother's contention, Family Court properly admitted in evidence hearsay statements during the fact-finding hearing to establish that the child had been sexually abused while under the mother's supervision by his half brother. It is well settled that " ‘[a] child's out-of-court statements may form the basis for a finding of [abuse] as long as they are sufficiently corroborated by [any] other evidence tending to support their reliability’ " ( Matter of Nicholas J.R. [Jamie L.R.], 83 A.D.3d 1490, 1490, 922 N.Y.S.2d 679 [4th Dept. 2011], lv denied 17 N.Y.3d 708, 2011 WL 4028757 [2011] ; see Family Ct. Act § 1046[a][vi] ; Matter of Mateo v. Tuttle, 26 A.D.3d 731, 732, 809 N.Y.S.2d 699 [4th Dept. 2006] ). Such statements, when corroborated, "are admissible in custody and visitation proceedings that are based in part upon allegations of abuse or neglect" ( Matter of Montalbano v. Babcock, 155 A.D.3d 1636, 1637, 65 N.Y.S.3d 396 [4th Dept. 2017], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 912, 81 N.Y.S.3d 372, 106 N.E.3d 755 [2018] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Cobane v. Cobane, 57 A.D.3d 1320, 1321, 870 N.Y.S.2d 569 [3d Dept. 2008], lv denied 12 N.Y.3d 706, 879 N.Y.S.2d 52, 906 N.E.2d 1086 [2009] ). Courts have " ‘considerable discretion in determining whether a child's out-of-court statements...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Dixon v. Crow
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 19, 2021
    ...abuse have been reliably corroborated and whether the record as a whole supports a finding of abuse" ( Matter of Poromon v. Evans , 176 A.D.3d 1642, 1642, 112 N.Y.S.3d 366 [4th Dept. 2019] [internal quotation marks omitted]). Here, each child's out-of-court statements were sufficiently corr......
  • Krier v. Krier
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 20, 2019
    ...a sufficient "change in circumstances to warrant an inquiry into the best interests of the child" ( Matter of Poromon v. Evans , 176 A.D.3d 1642, 1643, 112 N.Y.S.3d 366 [4th Dept. 2019] ), based on both the expert testimony that the child was demonstrating elements of parental alienation (s......
  • People v. Thomas
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 4, 2019
    ...for failing to [object to such testimony] inasmuch as he may not have wished to draw further attention to [such testimony]’ " ( id. ). 176 A.D.3d 1642 Finally, defendant's "complaint about defense counsel's performance during ... closing arguments ‘merely amounts to a second-guessing of cou......
  • Mountzouros v. Mountzouros
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 5, 2021
    ...under the circumstances, granting the mother sole custody was in the children's best interests (see Matter of Poromon v. Evans , 176 A.D.3d 1642, 1643, 112 N.Y.S.3d 366 [4th Dept. 2019] ; Matter of Hares v. Walker , 8 A.D.3d 1019, 1020, 778 N.Y.S.2d 342 [4th Dept. 2004] ). Instead, the fath......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT