Porteous v. Fowler, s. 79-749 and 79-2501

Decision Date04 February 1981
Docket NumberNos. 79-749 and 79-2501,79-1511 and 79-1834,s. 79-749 and 79-2501
Citation394 So.2d 154
PartiesJohn PORTEOUS, II, Appellant, v. Donald W. FOWLER, Jr., and Holly Ann Fowler, Appellees. John PORTEOUS, II, Appellant, v. HARGRAVE YACHT SALES, INC., Appellee. John PORTEOUS, II, Appellant, v. AMERICANA YACHT BROKERAGE, INC., Appellee. , and 79-1813.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Paul D. Mark Lucas and Stuart E. Goldenberg of Hamilton, James, Merkle & Young, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ronald A. Fitzgerald of Fleming, O'Bryan & Fleming, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees-Donald W. Fowler, Jr. and Holly Ann Fowler.

W. Peter Burns of Burns, Middleton, Farrell & Faust, Palm Beach, for appellee-Hargrave Yacht Sales, Inc.

Eugene L. Heinrich of McCune, Hiaasen, Crum, Ferris & Gardner, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee-Americana Yacht Brokerage, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm each of the summary final judgments involved in these consolidated appeals, finding that no cause of action was sustained, nor, indeed, stated, as to any of the defendants below and that there are no genuine, material issues of fact.

We reverse the judgments awarding attorneys' fees on behalf of appellees, Hargrave and Fowler. In each instance the award was based upon Section 57.105 Florida Statutes. The amended complaint was filed in January, 1978, five months prior to the effective date of that statute. We determine that the statute has no retroactive effect, for the reasons expressed in Tuggle v. Government Employees Insurance Company, 220 So.2d 355 (Fla.1969) which involved attorneys' fees for services rendered in appellate proceedings. That rationale is equally applicable here.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

HERSEY and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., and WETHERINGTON, GERALD T., Associate Judge, concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Guthartz v. Lewis
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 8, 1981
    ...filed five months prior to the effective date of Section 57.105, rendering the statute inapplicable to this action. Porteous v. Fowler, 394 So.2d 154 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Second, none of the several applications and motions for attorneys' fees filed by the plaintiffs' attorneys during the c......
  • Mullins v. Kennelly
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 27, 2003
    ...of section 57.105 would not be applied retroactively); accord McMahan v. Toto, 256 F.3d 1120, 1129 (11th Cir.2001); Porteous v. Fowler, 394 So.2d 154 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). But that does not resolve the problem presented here because the trial judge sanctioned Mullins and Miller only for acti......
  • University Community Hosp. v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 26, 1985
    ...it existed before October 1, 1984, UCH refers us to Ship Shape v. Taylor, 397 So.2d 1199, 1201 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Porteous v. Fowler, 394 So.2d 154 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981); Love v. Jacobson, 390 So.2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Tuggle v. Government Employees Insurance Company, 220 So.2d 355 (Fla......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT