Porter v. State, 90-02003
| Decision Date | 12 February 1992 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-02003,90-02003 |
| Citation | 593 So.2d 1158 |
| Parties | 17 Fla. L. Weekly D499 Jimmy PORTER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Megan Olson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anne Y. Swing, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
Jimmy Porter appeals his judgment and sentence for sale of cocaine. We reverse and remand for a new trial, concluding that the trial court committed reversible error in allowing the state to name Porter's prior convictions during cross examination.
Porter testified and presented an alibi defense. During cross examination, the state asked Porter if he had been convicted of a felony. Porter responded affirmatively. The state then asked him the number of his convictions. Porter testified that he had been convicted of three felonies. The state then asked Porter if he had been convicted of a misdemeanor involving a crime of dishonesty. Porter testified that he had not been convicted of such a crime. The state thereafter inquired into the nature of a prior misdemeanor conviction for petit theft and six prior felony convictions. The trial court overruled defense counsel's objections. We conclude this was error.
The state may impeach the character of the defendant by asking him whether he or she has ever been convicted of a felony or of a crime involving dishonesty or a false statement, and how many times. Sec. 90.610(1), Fla.Stat. (1989); Williams v. State, 511 So.2d 1017 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 519 So.2d 988 (Fla.1987) (citing Cummings v. State, 412 So.2d 436 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)); Gavins v. State, 587 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). If the defendant either denies having been convicted or misstates the number of previous convictions, the state may introduce into evidence certified records of the convictions. Williams. Although the state entered into evidence six certified judgments of conviction, it was improper for the state to "name the specific crimes or to state the nature of the crimes." See Gavins, 587 So.2d at 490 (citations omitted). The nature of the crimes is admissible only by entering into evidence the records of the convictions. Fulton v. State, 335 So.2d 280 (Fla.1976).
We disagree with the state's argument that the error was harmless. During closing argument, the state elaborated on the nature of Porter's prior convictions, specifically naming each one. Harmless error...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
McFadden v. State, 98-91.
...convictions." Sheffield v. State, 585 So.2d 396, 397 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), approved, 595 So.2d 37 (Fla.1992); see also Porter v. State, 593 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). 3. Finally, both of these mistakes were further exacerbated when McFadden was not permitted to explain to the jury that h......
-
White v. Singletary
...copy of the witnesses's prior convictions into the record. See e.g. Fulton v. State, 335 So.2d 280 (Fla.1976); Porter v. State, 593 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Gavins v. State, 587 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Meyers v. State, 561 So.2d 1304 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Cummings v. State, 412 S......
-
Williams v. State, 93-04236
...usually certified copies of the judgment and sentence, without stating the exact nature of the prior convictions. Porter v. State, 593 So.2d 1158 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Peoples v. State, 576 So.2d 783 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991), aff'd on other grounds, 612 So.2d 555 (Fla.1992); Cummings, 412 So.2d Co......
-
Cannon v. State
...simply failed to remember the exact number, as opposed to testifying to a false number. See Perez, 648 So.2d at 719; Porter v. State, 593 So.2d 1158, 1159 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). This case is distinguishable from Britton v. State, 604 So.2d 1288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). In Britton, we held that it w......