Porter v. U.S. Life Ins. Co.
Citation | 160 Mass. 183,35 N.E. 678 |
Parties | PORTER v. UNITED STATES LIFE INS. CO. |
Decision Date | 29 November 1893 |
Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts |
James
B. Carroll, for plaintiff.
T.M Brown, for defendant.
The policy provides in the first condition that, "in case any premium or payment required or agreed to be made now or hereafter, in connection with this insurance, shall not be so paid when due, then this contract shall become null and void and of no effect, except as provided in the special conditions on the back of this policy." The fifth condition of the policy is as follows: "The contract of insurance is contained only in this policy and the application, (which is hereby made part hereof,) taken together, and none of its terms or conditions shall be modified or waived except in writing, signed by the president, together with the secretary or actuary." The eighth condition of the policy is as follows: "This policy is issued under the limited tontine dividend plan of this company, on the special conditions stated on the back of this policy, which are hereby accepted by the assured as part of this contract, as fully as if they were recited at length over the signatures affixed hereto." On the back of the policy is the following condition: The policy was dated May 28, 1887, and the premiums were duly paid thereon semiannually up to and including the premium due May 28, 1890. Thereafter no premiums were paid. Ernest H Porter, the insured, died July 1, 1891. Neither he nor any one in his behalf made a written demand upon the company for an extension of the policy pursuant to the fifth condition on the back. The principal contentions on the part of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nickell v. Phoenix Insurance Company of Brooklyn
... ... power to waive the furnishing of proofs of loss. Wood on Ins ... [1 Ed.], p. 730; Wood on Ins. [2 Ed.], secs. 429 and 447; ... Ins. Co., 136 N.Y. 547; Carey v ... Ins. Co., 54 N.W. 18; Porter v. Ins. Co., 160 ... Mass. 183; Moore v. Ins. Co., 141 N.Y. 219; ... collecting the premiums and signed the policies. During the ... life of the policy, on September 13, 1894, the property was ... totally ... ...
-
Blair v. Nat'l Reserve Ins. Co.
...to include the abrogation of the condition in a manner excluded by the very terms of the contract itself. Porter v. United States Life Ins. Co., 160 Mass. 183, 186, 35 N.E. 678;Shapiro v. Security Inc. Co., 256 Mass. 358, 365, 152 N.E. 370;Friedman v. Orient Ins. Co., 278 Mass. 596, 599, 18......
-
Bogosian v. New York Life Ins. Co.
... ... defendant had the power to bind it in a way contrary to that ... contemplated by the policy. Porter v. United States Life ... Ins. Co. 160 Mass. 183 ... Hayes v. Metropolitan Life ... Ins. Co. 236 Mass. 476 ... Friedman v. Orient Ins ... Co. 278 ... ...
-
Sun Mut. Ins. Co. v. Searles
... ... N.E. 31; Wash v. Insurance Co., 73 N.Y. 10; ... Marvin v. Insurance Co., 85 N.Y. 278; Porter v ... Insurance Co., 35 N.E. 678 ... Miller, ... Smith & Hirsh, for appellees ... ...