Portland Adventist Medical Center v. Sheffield
Decision Date | 14 April 1987 |
Citation | 735 P.2d 371,303 Or. 197 |
Parties | PORTLAND ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant, v. C.R. SHEFFIELD, Director, Division of Assessment and Taxation, Multnomah County, Respondent. OTC 2400; S33271. |
Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
William Dickas, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief on behalf of appellant. With him on the brief was Kell, Alterman & Runstein, Portland.
Jane E. Stonecipher, Asst. County Counsel, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief on behalf of respondent. With her on the brief was John B. Leahy, County Counsel for Multnomah County, Portland.
The Multnomah County Assessor commenced omitted property proceedings against the operators of various non-profit hospitals, including plaintiff Portland Adventist Medical Center and required the plaintiff to show cause, pursuant to ORS 311.209, why some of the plaintiff's properties should not be added to the tax rolls. ORS 311.209 provides:
The plaintiff responded to the notice and requested that the response be kept confidential. The assessor refused, resulting in this declaratory judgment action before the Tax Court. 1
The plaintiff argued that although no statute expressly mandates that information submitted to the assessor under ORS 311.209 be kept confidential, 2 the legislature has expressed a policy of keeping this type of information confidential under other provisions of the revenue and taxation laws. The plaintiff cites ORS 308.290(5) ( ) and ORS 314.835 ( ), and contends that, "the Assessor and the Tax Court should first at least examine the information presented by [the plaintiff] to determine if it is of a kind determined by the legislature to be confidential."
The Tax Court rejected the plaintiff's argument and dismissed the plaintiff's complaint. The order states:
We agree with the Tax Court. The statutory scheme demonstrates that the legislature has recognized and protected privacy interests when it has perceived a need for doing so. See, e.g., ORS 308.290(5) ( ); 314.835 (except as otherwise provided "it shall be unlawful for the department * * * to divulge * * * the amount of income tax * * * disclosed in any * * * [income tax] return"). Information submitted to obtain a tax exemption has not been given the statutory protection afforded information...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Wagner
...such construction is, if possible, to be adopted as will give effect to all." ORS 174.010. See also Portland Adventist Medical Center v. Sheffield, 303 Or. 197, 200, 735 P.2d 371 (1987). A defendant may not be sentenced to death rather than to prison whenever he or she is likely to engage i......
-
Nutbrown v. Munn
...Assembly. Or.Laws 1989, ch. 414, § 2. The language appears to be a direct legislative response to Portland Adventist Medical Center v. Sheffield, 303 Or. 197, 735 P.2d 371 (1987), a case in which the Tax Court entertained an original proceeding for declaratory relief. The direct proceeding ......
-
State ex rel. Juvenile Dept. of Lincoln County v. Ashley
...to give effect to a perceived legislative intent not supported by the words of the statute. See Portland Adventist Medical Center v. Sheffield, 303 Or. 197, 200, 735 P.2d 371 (1987) (courts are not at liberty to fill in perceived legislative omissions); State ex rel. Everding v. Simon, 20 O......
-
Oregonian Pub. Co. v. Portland School Dist. No. 1J
...Exemption means merely that the public body is not obligated to disclosure under ORS 192.420. See Portland Adventist Medical Center v. Sheffield, 303 Or. 197, 199 n. 2, 735 P.2d 371 (1987); see also Jordan v. MVD, supra, 308 Or. at 444, 781 P.2d 1203 (Gillette, J., concurring). The legislat......