Posey v. Rome Oil & Fertilizer Co.

Decision Date12 December 1923
Docket Number3786.
PartiesPOSEY v. ROME OIL & FERTILIZER CO.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Rehearing Denied Jan. 25, 1924.

Syllabus by the Court.

Under art. 9, § 3. par. 1, of the Constitution of Georgia (Civil Code of 1910, §§ 6584, 3413), a debtor may waive or renounce in writing his right to the benefit of the exemption provided in this article, except as to wearing apparel, and not exceeding $300 worth of household and kitchen furniture and provisions. But money, though less in amount than $300, which might be readily converted into any one of the classes of property mentioned in the Constitution and laws as exempt does not belong to either of them, and is not protected against the waiver.

Cotton is not "provisions" within the meaning of the constitutional provisions just cited.

The court did not err in ordering the receiver to sell the corn purchased with the money set apart as exempt, and out of the proceeds to pay first the costs, and then the balance to the creditors as provided in the order.

Error from Superior Court, Gordon County; M. C. Tarver, Judge.

Suit by the Rome Oil & Fertilizer Company against M. N. Posey. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

Within Const. art. 9, § 3, par. 1 (Civ. Code 1910, §§ 6584, 3413) relating to the right of a debtor to waive exemptions cotton is not "provisions."

The Rome Oil & Fertilizer Company brought an equitable petition against M. N. Posey, and alleged the following facts: M. N Posey was, on November 7, 1922, adjudged a bankrupt. His case is pending in the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia; and he has not applied for or obtained a discharge in the bankruptcy case. James A McFarland was duly appointed, qualified, and is acting as trustee of the bankrupt's estate. On November 28, 1922, the trustee set apart to the bankrupt a homestead and exemption consisting of the following property: "Household and kitchen furniture, $25; 50 bushels of corn, of the value of $40; cash, $235; total $300." Plaintiff is a creditor of the estate, and holds a judgment against the bankrupt for $254.77, $15.58 cost, and $28.58 attorney's fees, with interest from October 15, 1921. The judgment was based upon a note which included a clause in which the maker of the note waived any and all homestead or exemption to which he or his family might be entitled under the laws of the state of Georgia; and the debt is of such character that a discharge in bankruptcy would bar recovery thereon. The homestead which has been set apart as aforesaid has not been approved by the referee in bankruptcy, and no order has been passed setting apart the same to the bankrupt, nor has the same been delivered to him; and it is subject to plaintiff's claim. Plaintiff is advised and believes that the bankrupt is making an effort to secure possession of the property described above, and that he will move it away and render it impossible for plaintiff to secure or enforce its claim against the defendant. Plaintiff is without adequate remedy at law for enforcement of its rights against the exempt property. The prayer was that a receiver be appointed, with authority and direction to intervene in the court of bankruptcy for the purpose of having the homestead and exemption, so set apart to Posey, delivered to such receiver, and that he take possession thereof and hold the property subject to the further order of the court. The defendant filed an answer in which he averred, among other things, that--

"the exemption which has been set apart to him by the trustee, approved and determined by the bankruptcy court, is the nonwaiverable constitutional $300.00 homestead and exemption as provided by the statutes of Georgia, consisting of household and kitchen furniture, $25.00; 25 bushels of potatoes, $40.00; 100 bushels of corn, $60.00; and corn purchased by the trustee of the amount of 199 7/11 bushels, of the value of $219.58; total, $284.58; that the homestead and exemption claimed is nonwaiverable and is not subject to the plaintiff's execution, nor the note upon which said execution is based. * * * Defendant says, on the contrary, that the exemption as hereinbefore specified has been allowed to him by the court of bankruptcy, and is not subject to plaintiff's indebtedness."

On the trial it was agreed that the presiding judge should determine the case without the intervention of a jury, passing upon all questions of law and fact at issue. The defendant introduced in evidence a certified copy of the original report of exemption, signed and filed by J. A. McFarland, trustee, as follows:

"The following is a schedule of property designated and set apart to be retained by the bankrupt aforesaid, as his own property, under the provisions
of the acts of Congress relating to bankruptcy: Household and kitchen furniture, $25.00; 50 bushels of corn, of the value of $40.00; cash, $235.00; total, $300.00."

Also, a certified copy of an amendment to his schedule, filed on December 13, 1922, in the bankruptcy court, which was signed and sworn to by Posey and certified by the deputy clerk as follows:

"And now comes the bankrupt by leave of the court, and amends his original schedule by striking from schedule B-5 'cotton, $235.00,' and adding in lieu thereof 'corn, of the value of $235.00.' Petitioner was advised and believed, at the time of the filing of his original schedules, that he was selecting articles allowed under the constitutional nonwaiverable $300.00 homestead as provided by the statute of Georgia. The trustee sold the cotton claimed and has converted the same into cash, and did, on the 28th day of November, 1922, set apart bankrupt's exemption, $235.00, of which was set apart in cash. Petitioner desires that said cash be invested in corn by the trustee herein and set apart to him as part of his exemption. Should the court hold that that cannot be done in this court, then petitioner prays that said cash, $235.00, be turned over to the court of ordinary of Gordon county, to be by that court invested in corn as selected. To that end petitioner prays that the trustee herein be directed to so amend his report of exemption."

The defendant also introduced a certified copy of an order upon said amendment, passed by C. D. McCutchen, referee, on December 19, 1922, and certified by J. C. Printup, deputy clerk, as follows:

"The above and foregoing amendment having been offered and filed on the 13th day of December, 1922, within twenty days from the filing of the report of exemption, and action thereon being deferred for the purpose of hearing from opposing counsel, it is therefore ordered that said amendment be and the same is hereby allowed nunc pro tunc. Ordered further that the trustee amend his report by setting apart to the bankrupt 201 1/8 bushels of corn of the value of $219.58, to be purchased with the cash in his hands, in addition to the other items therein listed."

The trial judge appended a note in the bill of exceptions, the substance of which is as follows:

"Upon the first hearing of this case, which was had by consent of parties on March 17, 1923, the court inquired of counsel whether or not the referee had passed an order directing the trustee to invest the cash $235.00 in corn, and was informed by Mr. F. K. McCutchen, of counsel for M. N. Posey, that there had been such an order passed. The court thereupon continued the hearing until March 24, 1923, with direction that a certified copy of this order be obtained. On the date of the final hearing, March 24, 1923, the court again inquired of counsel whether or not a certified copy of this order had been obtained. Counsel for Posey thereupon introduced, under one certificate of the deputy clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Northwestern Division, the copies herein referred to of the report of the trustee setting aside the exemption to the bankrupt, the amendment filed on the 13th day of December, 1922, by the bankrupt, to his original claim of exemption, and an account of the trustee in bankruptcy for Posey, with the order of the referee allowing the same, the last named not being set out in this bill of exceptions nor material to the questions herein raised. The court again called attention to the fact that no order of the referee directing the investment of the cash in corn appeared in this record. Counsel for Posey thereupon sought to prove by J. A. McFarland, trustee, that the referee had orally directed such investment. This evidence the court excluded upon objection of counsel for plaintiff. The court thereafter passed the judgment herein complained of, stating as his reason for so doing the failure of the referee or any other proper authority to direct the investment of the cash in corn. The order of the referee of December 19, 1922, immediately hereinbefore appearing, was on the back of and at the top of one of the sheets attached to the certificate by the deputy clerk of the United States court. It was not called to the court's attention until this bill of exceptions was presented for signature."

The defendant introduced also a certified copy of the amendment to the report of exemptions, dated and filed December 19, 1922, and signed by J. A. McFarland, trustee, and certified by the deputy clerk, as follows:

"The above and foregoing report of exemptions is hereby amended by striking cash $235.00 and adding in lieu thereof corn in the amount of 199 7/11
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT