Potts v. State
| Decision Date | 27 September 1978 |
| Docket Number | 56677.,No. 56676,56676 |
| Citation | 571 S.W.2d 180 |
| Parties | Mary POTTS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Harry Louis Zimmermann, Dallas, for appellant.
Henry Wade, Dist. Atty., Ronald D. Hinds and Jan Potts, Asst. Dist. Attys., Dallas, for the State.
Before ROBERTS, PHILLIPS and VOLLERS, JJ.
These are appeals from convictions for the offense of theft over $200.00. V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 31.03. The appellant waived a trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty in each case.
Appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction. Article 1.15, V.A.C.C.P., provides that where a jury is waived in a felony case, "it shall be necessary for the state to introduce evidence into the record showing the guilt of the defendant and said evidence shall be accepted by the court as the basis for its judgment and in no event shall a person charged be convicted upon his plea without sufficient evidence to support the same."
The State introduced into evidence appellant's confessions without objection. Appellant took the stand and testified that the contents of the confessions were "substantially true and correct." No other testimony was offered. Therefore, in order to determine the sufficiency of the evidence, we must look to the appellant's confessions.1 The confessions do not state that the property was taken without the owner's effective consent as was alleged in the indictment.
In Adam v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 490 S.W.2d 189, the defendant pled guilty to the court and executed a consent to stipulate the evidence. The consent to stipulation read, in pertinent part, as follows:
"Said defendant ... agrees and stipulates that he, the said defendant, is the identical person named in the indictment in the above styled and numbered cause and that all the acts and allegations in said indictment ... charging the offense of Sale of a Narcotic Drug to-wit: Heroin are true and correct...."
This Court wrote:
"This `catch-all' stipulation is sufficient to constitute a judicial confession which will alone support a conviction."
In Miles v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 486 S.W.2d 326, the defendant's affidavit by which he agreed to the stipulation of testimony and which was admitted into evidence stated, "All the acts and allegations in said indictment charging the offense of Passing as True a Forged Instrument are true and correct ...." It is evident, therefore, that an affirmation of the indictment as true and correct will constitute a judicial confession sufficient to support a judgment of conviction.
Should then a judicial confession that one committed an offense as charged in the indictment and an in-court affirmation of that judicial confession constitute compliance with the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Morris v. State, 197-84
...v. State, supra; cf., LaFlore v. State, 595 S.W.2d 862 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); Brown v. State, supra; Gary v. State, supra. 8 Potts v. State, 571 S.W.2d 180 9 But see this writer's dissenting opinion, Dinnery v. State, supra, at 354, nn. 11, 12 and 13. 10 Article 1.15, supra, was subsequently am......
-
Dinnery v. State
...THE DEFENDANT: Yes, sir. The court accepted appellant's plea, assessed his punishment and suspended his sentence. In Potts v. State, 571 S.W.2d 180 (Tex.Cr.App.1978) this Court was confronted with that appellant's two written stipulations concerning commission of two thefts; each stipulatio......
- Hall v. State
-
Snyder v. State
...of the offense by virtue of its failure to recite that appellant intentionally and knowingly possessed the contraband. In Potts v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 571 S.W.2d 180, it was found that a judicial confession entered in a guilty plea proceeding was insufficient evidence to support the defenda......